BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//TYPO3/NONSGML Calendarize//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:calendarize-concept-drift-detection-in-unlabeled-data-streams
DTSTAMP:20260413T114427Z
DTSTART:20260427T080000Z
SUMMARY:Concept Drift Detection in Unlabelled Data Streams
DESCRIPTION:On Monday\, 27 April 2026\, at 10:00 a.m.\,Daniel Lukats Unive
 rsity of Oldenburgwill give a lecture entitledConcept Drift Detection in U
 nlabelled Data StreamsThe lecture will take place online: https://studconf
 .uol.de/rooms/mpz-niv-bz5-40a/join The lecture will be held in English.\nA
 bstract:In long-running data streams\, an issue called concept drift may a
 rise. Concept drift denotes changes in the feature distribution P(X) or th
 e posterior distribution P(Y | X)\, such that the performance of classifie
 rs employed on the data stream may deteriorate severely. Besides detecting
  concept drifts for the adaptation of classifiers\, concept drifts themsel
 ves may be worth detecting\, e.g.\, in marine domains where changes such a
 s ocean fronts or algal blooms can be interpreted as concept drifts which 
 merit further action.Although various concept drift detectors have been su
 ggested in the literature\, most detectors are supervised: They require an
 d assume the availability of the true label immediately after predicting i
 t. This assumption is hard to justify\, since labelling a potentially infi
 nite data stream in real time can become prohibitively expensive.While a n
 umber of unsupervised approaches to concept drift detection exist\, few ha
 ve been demonstrated on real-world applications. Instead\, these methods a
 re commonly evaluated on artificially created problems without ground trut
 h information about concept drift. Thus\, proxy metrics are commonly used 
 in the literature. However\, these proxies are flawed\, as they often rewa
 rd frequent false positives more than correct detection.Based on this inte
 rpretation of the state of the art\, this work discusses the following res
 earch questions: How can unsupervised concept drift detectors detect conce
 pt drift on continuous features? How can the predictive quality and the ti
 meliness of concept drift detectors be evaluated in an unbiased fashion?To
  this end\, existing metrics such as the F1 Score are adapted for use in c
 oncept drift detection. Then a system encompassing an unsupervised concept
  drift detector and optional components to address common real-world prope
 rties such as seasonal data\, trend and noisy features is evaluated. These
  research questions are discussed on synthetic data streams and in the con
 text of oceanographic data streams with a case study on the detection of a
 lgal blooms in the Baltic Sea.Supervisor: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Axel Hahn
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p class="text-center">On Monday\, 27 April 2
 026\, at 10:00 a.m.\,<br />Daniel Lukats University of Oldenburg<br />will
  give a lecture entitled<br />Concept Drift Detection in Unlabelled Data S
 treams<br />The lecture will take place online: <a href="https://studconf.
 uol.de/rooms/mpz-niv-bz5-40a/join">https://studconf.uol.de/rooms/mpz-niv-b
 z5-40a/join</a> <br />The lecture will be held in English.</p>\n<p><strong
 >Abstract</strong>:<br />In long-running data streams\, an issue called co
 ncept drift may arise. Concept drift denotes changes in the feature distri
 bution P(X) or the posterior distribution P(Y | X)\, such that the perform
 ance of classifiers employed on the data stream may deteriorate severely. 
 Besides detecting concept drifts for the adaptation of classifiers\, conce
 pt drifts themselves may be worth detecting\, e.g.\, in marine domains whe
 re changes such as ocean fronts or algal blooms can be interpreted as conc
 ept drifts which merit further action.<br />Although various concept drift
  detectors have been suggested in the literature\, most detectors are supe
 rvised: They require and assume the availability of the true label immedia
 tely after predicting it. This assumption is hard to justify\, since label
 ling a potentially infinite data stream in real time can become prohibitiv
 ely expensive.<br />While a number of unsupervised approaches to concept d
 rift detection exist\, few have been demonstrated on real-world applicatio
 ns. Instead\, these methods are commonly evaluated on artificially created
  problems without ground truth information about concept drift. Thus\, pro
 xy metrics are commonly used in the literature. However\, these proxies ar
 e flawed\, as they often reward frequent false positives more than correct
  detection.<br />Based on this interpretation of the state of the art\, th
 is work discusses the following research questions: How can unsupervised c
 oncept drift detectors detect concept drift on continuous features? How ca
 n the predictive quality and the timeliness of concept drift detectors be 
 evaluated in an unbiased fashion?<br />To this end\, existing metrics such
  as the F1 Score are adapted for use in concept drift detection. Then a sy
 stem encompassing an unsupervised concept drift detector and optional comp
 onents to address common real-world properties such as seasonal data\, tre
 nd and noisy features is evaluated. These research questions are discussed
  on synthetic data streams and in the context of oceanographic data stream
 s with a case study on the detection of algal blooms in the Baltic Sea.<br
  /><strong>Supervisor</strong>: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Axel Hahn</p>
LOCATION:
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:calendarize-departmentrat
DTSTAMP:20260316T162603Z
DTSTART:20260429T110000Z
DTEND:20260429T120000Z
SUMMARY:Department council
DESCRIPTION:
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:
LOCATION:Meeting room in StudIP event 2.01.888 DPR Computing Science (http
 s://elearning.uni-oldenburg.de/dispatch.php/course/details?sem_id=e0180451
 c9ee9edb1c3ba4fd34e5fbc6&sso=cas&cancel_login=1&ticket=ST-4524636-MY3KWgBy
 BQtaitZAKTcwvr3fwDUcas05)
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
