cern-0 | NEXT |
cern-1 | NEXT |
cern-1a | NEXT |
cern-2 | NEXT |
cited: Stevan Harnad for the authors (see discussion
in American Scientist (2004):
A successful outcome of the Berlin II meeting would be an agreement
that Open Access (OA) to journal
articles reporting funded research must be provided by funded researchers
and institutions. That is *all* that is needed in order to implement
the Berlin Declaration.
cern-2a | NEXT |
cern-3 | NEXT |
cern-3a | NEXT |
cern-3b | NEXT |
The German DINI looks for cooperation with similar organizations of other countries.
cern-4 | NEXT |
Open Access of Distributed Professional Servers
cern-5 | DINI Certificate for Professional OA Servers | NEXT |
Recommendation:
cern-6 | NEXT |
Recommendation:
cern-7 | NEXT |
Recommendation:
cern-8 | NEXT |
Recommendation:
cern-9 | NEXT |
Recommendation:
cern-10 | NEXT |
Recommendation:
cern-11 | NEXT |
Recommendation:
cern-12 | NEXT |
Recommendation:
cern-13 | NEXT |
Recommendation:
cern-14 | NEXT |
cern-15 | NEXT |
OA needs professional services:
cern-16 | NEXT |
DINI Certificate to download:
www.dini.de/zertifikat/dini_certificate.pdf
Contact:
- search by google for hilf
or
the DINI office www.dini.de at gs@dini.de
cern-n | NEXT |
As I alas cannot attend the Berlin-2 conference at CERN on May 12, http://www.zim.mpg.de/openaccess-cern/ I can only skywrite my hopes as to the outcome:A successful outcome would be an agreement that Open Access (OA) to journal articles reporting funded research must be provided by funded researchers and institutions. That is *all* that is needed in order to implement the Berlin Declaration.
Any further stipulations or partiality as to *how* that OA is provided will only handicap and hamstring the implementation phase and diminish or even block its success. The options (OA journals, OA self-archiving, copyright retention, subsidising OA journal publication costs) can be mapped out, but they must *not* be mandated. The *only* thing that needs to be mandatory is OA *provision* (for funded research). The rest all follows naturally from that where needed, on a case by case basis. It is *not* necessary to mandate copyright retention. That is one of the *options* for OA provision. If we directly mandate copyright retention we simply add more needless obstacles and handicaps, forcing all authors into needless conflict with their publishers and forcing all institutions into needless conflict with their authors. Just leave it to authors and their institutions which of the OA options they use to provide OA in each case (having listed all the options for them)! But don't mandate any specific option. If you have a suitable OA journal to publish in, fine. But you are not required to do so; you are only required to provide OA. If you are able to retain copyright, that's fine. But you are not required to do so; you are only required to provide OA. If your institution can help fund OA journal publishing, that's fine. But it is not required to do so; it is only required to provide OA. Eighty-three percent of journals already give their green light to OA provision via self-archiving. Why would we want to make copyright-retention into a gratuitous further conflict between author and publisher when it is *not necessary* in order to provide OA for 83% of journals?
I very much hope that those attending the CERN meeting will see that it is far more promising for OA provision if the implementation strategy is a realistic one, not one bit more demanding than it needs to be in order to generate 100% OA.
That's exactly what the Institutional Commitment calls for: no more, no less: Institutional Commitment
And that's exactly what is needed -- no more, no less -- to implement the Berlin Declaration: Swan & Brown (2004) "asked authors to say how they would feel if their employer or funding body required them to deposit copies of their published articles in one or more... repositories. The vast majority... said they would do so willingly."Swan, A. & Brown, S.N. (2004) JISC/OSI Journal Authors Survey Report. JISCOA report and Harnad: ''What Provosts Need to Mandate''
Stevan Harnad