Press & Communication

+49 (0) 441 798-5446


Prof. Dr Dr Joachim Willems

To what extent can and should religious education be a place for interreligious dialogue? How are confessional religious education and identity formation connected? These are the kind of questions that theologian and educationalist Prof. Dr Dr Joachim Willems, who has held the Chair of Religious Education at the University of Oldenburg since 2016, is concerned with. In his research and teaching he places a particular focus on interreligious and diversity-sensitive education.

Ariane Dihle

Antisemitism-critical religious education is one of the topics that Ariane Dihle researches and teaches to future teachers at the University of Oldenburg, also in the current winter semester. After obtaining her teaching degree in theology and German studies, Dihle first worked as a teacher and then joined the Oldenburg Institute of Protestant Theology and Religious Education as a research associate in 2018.

The network

The aim of the network for religious education and theology that is critical of antisemitism and racism (Netzwerk für antisemitismus- und rassismuskritische Religionspädagogik und Theologie, NARRT) is to help counter antisemitism and racism in the church and in society at large. To this end, it brings together people who “want to engage in self-reflection on the entanglement of religious education and theology in antisemitic and racist structures”.

The network was launched in the summer of 2016 as a collaborative project between the Evangelische Akademie zu Berlin, the Comenius Institute in Münster and the Institute of Protestant Theology and Religious Education at the University of Oldenburg. Seven researchers from the university are currently among the roughly 100 members of the network. Oldenburg theologian Dr Dominik Gautier is a member of the network’s current Steering Committee.


Institute of Protestant Theology and Religious Education

Prof. Dr Dr Joachim Willems

Ariane Dihle

  • A pile of textbooks in an open school rucksack.

    The school rucksack is packed: "School is a place where knowledge is constantly reproduced and passed on to the next generation," says religious education expert Ariane Dihle. In this way, antisemitic narratives are also passed on - unintenionally or against all intentions. Photo: University of Oldenburg / Deike Stolz Universität Oldenburg / Deike Stolz

  • „Schulbücher jüdisch-christlich bedenken“ – Motto der jüngsten Tagung und eine Aufgabe, der unter anderem sie sich stellen: der Theologe und Erziehungswissenschaftler Joachim Willems, Hochschullehrer für Religionspädagogik, und die Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin Ariane Dihle. Foto: Universität Oldenburg / Daniel Schmidt

On the lookout for antisemitism

Materials for school lessons are a mirror of society. Researchers in religious education have been analyzing for years how textbooks on religion - subliminally and usually unintentionally - convey anti-Jewish narratives.

Materials for school lessons are a mirror of society. Researchers in religious education have been analyzing for years how textbooks on religion - subliminally and usually unintentionally - convey anti-Jewish narratives.

You recently co-organised a conference in Berlin that dealt with antisemitic narratives in school textbooks. How do such problematic interpretation patterns find their way into teaching materials in the first place?

Joachim Willems: Textbooks are a mirror of society: it is scientifically demonstrable that they reflect many of the stereotypes and prejudices that are established in society. All of us – including people who produce educational materials – are entangled in antisemitic narratives which we pass on unintentionally or even despite our best intentions.

Ariane Dihle: Materials with this kind of content, even if they only implicitly reference antisemitic narratives, can confirm or even reinforce antisemitic attitudes – especially among those who are already familiar with these narratives from their environment outside school. School is a place where knowledge is constantly reproduced and passed on to the next generation, so it can also be a key place for countering certain narratives.

We naturally don’t want these narratives to be repeated, but could you briefly outline what problematic depictions of Judaism can still be found in German-language religious textbooks today?

Willems: There are educational materials that portray Orthodox or ultra-Orthodox Judaism in a way that contributes to young people perceiving it as something “alien” rather than in all its diversity, for example. If religiosity is then also presented as stringent and restrictive, this can devalue Jewish religious practice. An example of this is dietary restrictions and religious holidays being portrayed as an obstacle to shared activities with non-Jewish people.

Dihle: We have also observed a focus on the history of persecution of Jewish people, a victimisation: Judaism is not discussed as a living religion in Germany, but is taught primarily in connection with the Shoah. This leads to people perceiving Jewish-German history as a history of opposition, which also makes Jews seem historically alien. And partially false narratives are repeated in the process.

Can you give examples?

Dihle: One prominent example is the alleged social envy that led to the pogroms in the Middle Ages. These pogroms are sometimes explained by pointing out that it was forbidden to charge interest in Christendom, with the result that Jews who worked in banking incurred the people’s wrath by charging high interest rates. But it has been proven that this is historically incorrect: Christians were allowed to charge interest and were active in the banking business, and many Jews in the Middle Ages certainly didn’t belong to the upper class. So there was no reason for social envy. What’s more, this attempt at an explanation implies a reversal of blame that exonerates the perpetrators of antisemitic pogroms.

Willems: For lessons in Christian religious education, the fact that Jesus was Jewish poses a special challenge: Christianity emerged from Judaism and is therefore also the result of a process of demarcation. That from which one sets oneself apart is often distorted in an attempt to present oneself in a more positive light. Textbooks often present Jesus in a way that puts him in strong opposition to Judaism, rather than showing him as a Jew in his Jewish environment. This can foster antisemitism. Teachers who discuss the crucifixion narrative in class should make sure that “the Jews” are not blamed for Jesus’s death. This would not be historically correct: only the Roman authorities could impose the death penalty by crucifixion.

Ensuring that Judaism is portrayed differently from the way it has been so far in educational media is something that researchers, among others, have been working on for decades...

Dihle: It’s certainly not a new topic. To bring about change, the University of Oldenburg’s religious education department has long been involved in the network NARRT, it is a network for religious education and theology that is critical of antisemitism and racism. This means we speak to the people at church authorities who are responsible for authorising religious books, and we also advise publishers. Unfortunately, not all our advice is heeded.

Willems: We also pass on our knowledge to teachers in training courses. And of course, the young people studying at our university to be future teachers are key. We see criticism of antisemitism as an overarching topic, so we hope that our graduates will bring the corresponding awareness to their future schools and places of work.

What is important for school lessons in view of the war in Israel?

Willems: Now more than ever it is vital to take a look at how Israel is talked about in the classroom. If Israel is portrayed merely as a centre of conflict, that is problematic. Of course, this is an issue that is relevant not only in religious education, but also in other lessons such as history and politics.

Dihle: To give a concrete example: at the most recent conference we discussed a book about religion in which Israel only appears under the heading “Religious fanaticism and fundamentalism”. The book was authorised just this summer and therefore probably won’t be revised for several years. Young people in Year 9 and 10 learn about Israel’s settlement policy, but they don’t learn that this is also considered problematic by sections of the Israeli population, nor do they learn anything about the terrorist organisation Hamas.

Interview: Deike Stolz

This might also be of interest to you:

Campus Life Study Affairs Theology

From a different era

Getting up at sunrise to excavate ancient relicts, bathing in the Jordan at noon, living at a kibbutz: What currently hardly seems imaginable was…

Dominik Gautier sits on a wooden bench in a forest and looks into the camera.
Top News Theology

Christianity as a resource

Theologian Dominik Gautier addresses pressing issues of our time. In this interview, he talks about the role of Christianity in perpetuating racism…

The Orthodox St Basil's Cathedral in Moscow.
Research Ukraine Top News Theology

How the Russian Orthodox Church legitimises the war

What is the role of the Russian Orthodox Church in the religious legitimation of Russia’s war against Ukraine? Theologist Joachim Willems presents an…

(Changed: 20 Jun 2024)  | 
Zum Seitananfang scrollen Scroll to the top of the page