Press & Communication

+49 (0) 441 798-5446


Committee for Good Scientific Practice


Prof. Dr. Katharina Al-Shamery

Institute for Chemistry

  • Portrait photo Katharina Al-Shamery

    Together with sociologist Prof. Dr. Martin Heidenreich, chemist Professor Prof. Dr. Katharina Al-Shamery is an ombudsperson on matters relating to good academic practice at the university. She also held this position at the German Research Foundation (DFG). Photo: University of Oldenburg

Listen, advise, settle disputes

A good team: professor of chemistry Katharina Al-Shamery and sociology professor Martin Heidenreich are the university's Ombudspersons for Good Academic Practice. Here, Al-Shamery talks about her role.

A good team: professor of chemistry Katharina Al-Shamery and sociology professor Martin Heidenreich are the university's Ombudspersons for Good Academic Practice. Here, Al-Shamery talks about her role.

"For three years now, Martin Heidenreich and I have been the main contact persons for matters relating to good academic practice at the university. When a case is brought to our attention our first step is to clarify what the problem is. If there are suspicions of serious academic misconduct – such as falsifying data – we pass the case on to the Commission for Good Academic Practice. Such cases are very rare. The Commission then decides whether the suspicion is justified and what measures are to be taken.

With other cases we try to mediate and settle disputes as far as possible – all on a confidential basis, of course. We deal with two main areas. The first is disputes involving publications: Who is entitled to be a co-author? What content should be included in a particular publication? The second is situations in which supervision relationships are not optimal. These situations can also lead to academic misconduct.

The party that contacts us first explains the problem – why they believe there is a conflict with good academic practice. This could be a co-author not being given due credit, for instance. We inform the other party of the accusation and they present their position. Then we invite both sides to a joint meeting and try to resolve the dispute through dialogue. Sometimes we find solutions. Sometimes the matter is not so easily resolved.

Martin Heidenreich and I are a well-practiced team. We always attend meetings together – also to get different perspectives on a case. And because these personal conversations are also about body language and other things that happen on a different level but are key to understanding the dispute.

A very valuable experience

Overall, there has been a marked increase in the number of disputes in recent years. On the one hand because there is a greater awareness of the topic – thanks, among other things, to the various courses for doctoral candidates offered by the Graduate Schools and Collaborative Research Centres. And on the other hand, because people have become bolder about pointing out errors since they know that the ombudspersons provide a setting where the matter is treated confidentially.

For the future, I would like to see more preventive measures – for instance new appointees could receive targeted training for their new tasks. In addition, hierarchical structures in which, for example, supervisors exert a lot of pressure on doctoral candidates in order to boost their own reputation should be avoided.

I would also like institutions to listen more to young researchers – to find out what their motivations are, and what problems they have. Students often go through frustrating phases when they are doing their doctorate. It would make sense for doctoral candidates to have designated persons they can talk to outside their own research group, and mentoring should also play an even bigger role.

Working as an ombudsperson is a very valuable experience. My awareness of the responsibility I bear as the leader of my research group and of my duty to ensure harmony among its members has grown – even if I don't know whether I always succeed. Whoever takes on this role should have a lot of experience – then they can be more relaxed about it. Mediation training would also be helpful before taking on this job."

Written up by Constanze Böttcher

This might also be of interest to you:

Jubiläum Campus Life

International Summer Fest 2024

An intercultural marketplace, delicious food, music, dance, theatre and open-air performances on the festival stage - that was the International…

View into the sky, in the foreground a computer cabinet hangs from a crane, in the background trees and the A1 building with a dove of peace, on the right the round wall of the lecture theatre centre still protrudes into the picture.
Buildings Sustainability Campus Life

Sustainable heating for the campus

The university is using heat energy more efficiently: It recovers waste heat from its computer centre, saving 100 tonnes of CO2 per year, making it…

The picture shows Ineke Hess. She is sitting opposite the interviewer and looks at him. She is smiling slightly. Both are sitting at a desk. Behind Hess, a flipchart for planning can be recognised in a blur.
Excellence Strategy Campus Life

Manager and mediator

As Consultant for Strategic Projects at the Department for Research and Transfer, Dr Ineke Hess is responsible for the Excellence Strategy. The…

(Changed: 20 Jun 2024)  | 
Zum Seitananfang scrollen Scroll to the top of the page