Satisfying work in collapsing new buildings
An autobiographical report
2009, in lecture theatre 1 of the University of Oldenburg
August 2022
Contents
1. parental home
1.1 Birth and escape
1.2 My mother
1.3 My father
2 Childhood and school
2.1 Twins
2.2 Childhood and adolescence
2.3 School and A-levels
2.4 Career choice
3 First degree and teaching career
3.1 Bethel Church University
3.2 Oldenburg University of Education
3.3 First teacher training examination
3.4 Primary school teacher in Ammerland
3.5 Second teacher training examination
4 Doctoral studies and work for the Kollegschulversuch
4.1 Just in time - studies at the Free University of Berlin (West)
4.2 Westfälische Wilhelmsuniversität Münster - Magister Artium
4.3 My doctoral supervisor Herwig Blankertz
4.4 Doctorate
4.5 Chaotic teaching
4.6 The North Rhine-Westphalia College School Trial
5 Marriage - four children - golden wedding anniversary
6 Professorship at the Carl von Ossietzky University
6.1 A professorship in Oldenburg - What more could you want?
6.2 Taking up the post and the professorship
6.3 Pilot programme for single-phase teacher training (ELAB)
6.4 Project studies
6.5 Focus of academic work and teaching activities
6.6 Supervision of internships
6.7 Dean's Office
6.8 Doctoral supervisors
6.9 Doctoral travelling cadre
6.10 Examination activities
6.11 University representative for examination matters
7 Co-operations
7.1 Centre for Pedagogical Professional Practice
7.2 Centre for School Reform
7.3 Teacher Education Research Workshop
7.4 Oldenburg team research - BLK pilot programme
7.5 GDR contacts and reunification
7.6 Research Training Group Didactic Reconstruction
7.7 Lecturer training programme for the IG-Metall trade union
7.8 Master's programme in school management at Kiel University
7.9 LABORSCHUL advisory board
7.10 CORNELSEN Advisory Board
8 Publications
8.1 Liaison with the Cornelsen publishing house
8.2 Longseller
8.3 By-catch
8.4 Drawings
9. sixtieth birthday in 2001 and retirement in 2009
Conclusion and addendum
First of all: I have spent almost my entire professional life in Einstürzende Neubauten[1] almost my entire professional life:
- No sooner had I become an employee of the North Rhine-Westphalian Ministry of Education and Cultural Affairs in 1972 to help set up the NW collegiate school experiment than this experiment was cut short by the then state government of NW due to a veto by the co-governing FDP in its most important element, namely the merger of the upper secondary school and the vocational school. We academics protested against this, but to no avail.
- No sooner had I been offered a professorship at the University of Oldenburg in 1975 and committed myself to actively participating in the development of the pilot scheme for single-phase teacher training than this pilot scheme was cancelled by the newly elected CDU state government in 1976.
- In 1989, I had barely used my long-standing contacts with Lothar Klingberg (Potsdam) and Edgar Rausch (Leipzig) for a cooperation agreement with the Clara Zetkin University of Applied Sciences in Leipzig as the then Dean of Faculty 1 when the GDR and, shortly afterwards, the Leipzig University of Education were wound up.
- No sooner had we switched to the (still halfway sensible) two-phase teacher training examination regulations at the University of Oldenburg following the cancellation of the "single-phase" model experiment, than the Bachelor/Master model was introduced as part of the Bologna Process and everything we had built up was shaken up again.[2]
That's life: And for me, this has meant that over time I have become accustomed to not putting too much heart and soul into the organisational structure of my own workplace and paying more attention to discovering meaning in my own work, even under adverse conditions. My Oldenburg colleague Astrid Kaiser remarked 20 years ago that this was an apolitical attitude. That's why I want to be more specific: I continue to believe that the debate about the right organisational form of teacher training is indispensable and I am still a staunch advocate of the concept of single-phase teacher training linked to early practical phases. However, the failure of major projects is no reason for me to sulk or even reduce my workload. Especially under adverse circumstances, it is all the more important in day-to-day teaching to act as a role model as a university teacher, to show students in concrete terms how to teach well and to support them in developing a humane teacher attitude. I have endeavoured to do this in my courses. More on this in section 6!
Text genesis: The first version of this text was written in 2006 at the request of my long retired Oldenburg colleague Bernhard Möller for a collection of essays with autobiographical texts by Oldenburg educationalists.[3] This old version has now been quadrupled in size and supplemented with many photos and drawings. Hence the new subtitle: "An autobiographical report".
Intentions: This text is not a contribution to educational theory, and certainly not to theorising. I have tried to do that in other places.[4] Despite its subtitle, the text is not an autobiography, but something like an account of 58 years of academic appointments, first at the Ocholt primary school (in the Oldenburg region), then at the Free University of Berlin and the Westphalian Wilhelms University in Münster, and from 1975 to the present day at the University of Oldenburg. The text also contains some rather personal background information on my professional career, which I am publishing here for the first time. They would have no place in a textbook!
Memory: I am writing this report from memory. I have only occasionally rummaged through old records and documents to check dates and names. Errors can occur with such an approach. As a former student of history, you know this from the analyses of oral history. I ask for your understanding.
Photos and scans: I have integrated many drawings, photos, guestbook excerpts, etc. into the text to make the descriptions more vivid. If anyone recognises themselves, I ask them afterwards for what is nowadays called a model release in the publishing industry.
A hint of narcissism: A clear egocentricity can hardly be avoided in such a self-report. People particularly like to report on people who have a well-known name in their own discipline and then bask in the fact that they have had dealings with them. The many small, pleasant and sometimes irritating experiences on the fringes of a long professional life are then ignored, partly because I have often long forgotten them. I ask for your understanding! Nevertheless, when this text was finished, I was astonished, even shocked, at how many nice and co-operative people I have worked with in 57 years.[5]
Oldenburg, 1 August 2022
1 August 2022

1. parental home
1.1 Birth and flight
I was born on 2 October 1941 in Lauenburg, Pomerania, the fourth of six children.
I am the younger twin of my brother Meinert Meyer by ten minutes. Our mother told us how to tell us apart: Meinert's face is a little pointed (like the point in the capital letter M), Hilbert's face is parallel (like the capital letter H).
My parents came from the state of Oldenburg (my father from Wilhelmshaven, my mother from Delmenhorst). So I was born in the north-east of what was then Germany rather by chance. It wasn't until 35 years ago, when I read a biography of the Polish Jewish educator Janus Korczak for the first time and looked up on the map where Treblinka[6] I was horrified to realise how close we lived to the extermination camps back then. My mother told us that she had heard from her brother-in-law Georg-Heinz (a theology student, then a soldier near Minsk, missing in Russia since 1944) that "bad things were happening in the East". But her brother-in-law hadn't told her anything more specific.
At the beginning of February 1945 - my father was stationed in Wilhelmshaven as a naval lieutenant - my mother fled to the West with the four children born at the time (two older brothers, Berend and Dierk, twin brother Meinert and myself) and my grandparents to escape the advancing Soviet army. A detailed account can be found in the HOMEPAGE file "Our escape story".
My mother wrote down how exhausting and risky the escape was for all of us.[7] We twins were tied to two long leather ropes so that we wouldn't get lost in the crowds in the train compartments. But we were never in mortal danger and obviously felt well protected. To this day, however, I occasionally dream that I am on a train and have lost my travelling companions or luggage, or that I am running around the station and can't find the right platform. Most of the time, the train doesn't stop where it's supposed to, or it doesn't arrive at all.
1.2 My mother
My mother Erna Meyer, née Günther, was born in Delmenhorst (west of Bremen) in 1912. She died in 2000 in Westerstede. Our mother was the eldest of four sisters. Her father Ernst Günther was a teacher in the Düsternort district of Delmenhorst. He was a keen gymnast and singer. He published a songbook that ended up with my brother Meinert in Münster. He died in 1918 during the First World War, when my mother was 6 years old, at the front in France (near Verdun).
My father Friedrich Meyer was responsible for the field service in the family. Our mother was in charge of the home office - at least in those years when I was aware of this as a teenager and young adult. We children came to our mother first with all our problems and requests and discussed what was said to our father - that's how we learnt to be reasonably diplomatic.
Our mother graduated from the Delmenhorster Oberrealschule. She actually wanted to study medicine, but that was unthinkable in her family between the two world wars for financial reasons. She was certainly what you would call a strong woman today.
She was repeatedly asked by acquaintances and relatives to resolve difficult situations. All her siblings and I, too, held her in high esteem and respected her, while this or that conflict was carried out with her father.
Throughout her life, Erna regretted not having had her own vocational training. She would say to every young woman who came to our house: "... but you're definitely doing vocational training!"
Painting: Our mum had been an enthusiastic amateur painter since she was a child and had come a long way. Two samples: a self-portrait from 1986 and a watercolour from 1981 showing a snow-covered path in the Thalenbusch in our home town of Westerstede. We were keen to get our hands on Erna's pictures, which she generously gave away.

When Erna celebrated her 80th birthday on 7 July 1992 and was already in a wheelchair due to osteoporosis, the six of us children collected all the Erna pictures we had received as gifts from her or had simply stolen and organised a private exhibition in the house of the Protestant Church in Westerstede. We then added Erna's pictures to the watercolours produced by us children and grandchildren (13 of them), oil paintings by Brother Meinert, the etchings by Dierk, the horse drawings by Sister Dörte, the silver jewellery by granddaughter Eltje and the model ships built by Hilbert from Danish beach timber (Section 5).



Three photos of this exhibition: on the left brother Meinert with two of his own oil paintings, in the centre Erna, pushed by grandson Berend, on the right a "New Year's Eve rocket" made by our son Tiedo, which was then set off at the end of the celebrations.
Erna drew us children again and again, and once modelled my brother Dierk's head in clay. Here is a drawing by Hilbert from 1948, when I was 7 years old. 
It was certainly because of our mother's talent for drawing and painting that I - like all the other five Meyer children - always enjoyed drawing myself, even though I didn't get that far for a long time (see section 8.4). Our mum simply took away our fear of putting anything on paper.
1.3 My father
My father Friedrich Georg Meyer, known as Friedel, was born in Wilhelmshaven in 1904 as the eldest of three children. He died in Westerstede in 1974.
My paternal grandfather was Georg Meyer, illegitimate son of the merchant Georg Orth[8] from Apen near Westerstede. He was initially a sailor on a torpedo boat stationed in Wilhelmshaven, on which he travelled to the German colony of Tsingtau (now Qingdao) in China and to Hiroshima in Japan during the Boxer Rebellion of 1897/98. After a few years, he was promoted to what was known as a deck officer (a promotion position between sailors and officers). He married my grandmother Wilhelmine, née Schreiber, from the village of Barnstorf, who lived in our house in Westerstede until she was 92 years old. At the end of the First World War, the Imperial Navy was disbanded and my grandfather was discharged. After that, he couldn't find any more work, so he was an early pensioner. When the air raids on the city of Wilhelmshaven intensified during the Second World War, my grandparents Georg and Wilhelmine moved in with us in Lauenburg/Pomerania.
Seminary education and doctorate: My father was the first in his family to be sent to the Oberrealschule in Wilhelmshaven, but was then left behind[9] and transferred to the teacher training college in Varel near Oldenburg.[10] After graduating, he became a primary school teacher at several schools in the Ammerland district. He then completed a degree in educational science in Bonn in two attempts. (In 1936, he was awarded a doctorate by Erich Rothacker (1881-1965) - a well-known philosopher who had initially welcomed National Socialism but then, according to his own testimony, went into internal emigration. After liberation from fascism, Jürgen Habermas, among others, did his doctorate under Rothacker. I read my father's dissertation and was rather reassured that the text on Georg Kerschensteiner's didactics - at least in my perception - did not contain any overtly National Socialist passages.
Nazi: According to his personal file, my father had been a member of the NSDAP since 1933, but apart from the serious office of Nazi officer 6 months before the end of fascism (see below), he never held a position in the party. He never spoke to us about it. We didn't ask either, but we knew the photos with the NSDAP party badge from the family photo album. My father's younger brother Georg-Heinz, a scholarship holder of the Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes, was an active member of the Confessing Church. My father never told us whether they quarrelled.
PH Lauenburg/Pomerania: In 1936, my parents got married. In 1938, my father was offered a position as a lecturer at the "Grenzlandhochschule" teacher training college in Lauenburg/Pomerania, where the young family moved with my eldest brother Berend, who had just been born.
The newly founded Lauenburg University was set up by the National Socialists specifically to ideologically develop and dominate the "eastern region". The first group of lecturers - all staunch Nazis - had fallen out after a few years to such an extent that they threatened each other at gunpoint during a staff meeting. As a result, the Reich Minister of Education, Bernhard Rust, decided to replace a large proportion of the staff.
- On the right in the photo from 1942: my father, the older brothers Berend and Dierk and the twins. (Who is who?)
This second, not completely, but somewhat "de-ideologised" group of lecturers included Wolfgang Sucker (1905-1968), later President of the Protestant Church of Hesse and Nassau, as a religious education teacher, Werner Figur, later to become a music teacher in Delmenhorst, and my father as a lecturer in school education in Lauenburg.[11]
Soldier: Soon after his appointment as a lecturer in Lauenburg, he was called up for military service in 1939, which my father completed in the navy in Wilhelmshaven, following the family tradition. He made it to the rank of lieutenant. He spent the last two years of the war as adjutant to the naval base commander in Wilhelmshaven. He was appointed an NS officer there in September 1944.[12] From this we can conclude that he was still an avowed Nazi at the time. At the end of the war, my father became a prisoner of war of the British Army of Occupation and was interned in the former Esterwegen concentration camp (where Carl von Ossietzky had been tortured a few years earlier). He returned from captivity in 1946. That was the first time I was aware of him as a five-year-old.
Post-war career: After "denazification"[13] my father first became a teacher at the Westerstede secondary school (without a first or second secondary school teacher's examination), then in 1950 he became a school inspector for the Ammerland district and in 1956 a professor of school education at the College of Education for Agricultural Teachers in Wilhelmshaven. He is therefore one of the many who were able to make a career in West Germany despite early NSDAP membership. He then also credibly campaigned for the establishment of democratic structures in my home parish of Westerstede, e.g. as chairman of the parents' council of the grammar school, as a member of the parish church council and the synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Oldenburg.

Friedel Meyer and Herwig Blankertz (at my wedding party in 1969)
PH for agricultural teachers: The Wilhelmshaven College for Agricultural Teachers was dissolved in 1973/74 and my father's position, who had become the rector in the meantime, was transferred to the establishment plan of the University of Oldenburg, which was being founded, in the Lower Saxony state budget. And it was precisely this "School Education" position that I held from 1975 to 2009. When I applied to Oldenburg, I didn't know about this coincidence. I would have been embarrassed. After all, there are no hereditary courts at universities. But when the call came, my father, who was already seriously ill with cancer at the time, told me that he had made this discovery. It wasn't until a dozen years later that I told others about this coincidence for the first time.
A first conclusion: I come from a middle-class, academic family, unfortunately my father was not sufficiently distanced from the Nazi dictatorship. My mother was more sceptical, but a strong woman who raised us eight children very well. I think the fact that my father was a university lecturer made it easier for me to plan my career: a doctorate was not unattainable for me. It seemed "doable" with the right amount of work. And I had no superfluous respect for professorial titles! At least my doctoral supervisor Herwig Blankertz once told me later that he enjoyed working with me precisely because of this completely natural and never laudatory way of dealing with him.

1949: Erna draws Hilbert (seven and a half years old)
2 Childhood and school
2.1 Twins
As mentioned at the beginning, I have an identical twin brother, Meinert Meyer (1941-2018), who - what a coincidence - also became a professor of school education and, after a first professorship in Halle (Saale), taught in the Department of Education at the University of Hamburg.

1943 - Mother Erna, Berend, Dierk and the twins
When we were still children, we were rather bothered by our twin status. Meinert liked to emphasise that he was 10 minutes older than me. I then told him something about Jacob and Esau (or at least planned to tell him). With one or two exceptions, our teachers couldn't tell us apart. That's why we only received different grades at grammar school in those subjects where written work was required. We sat in the same class until we finished school. We went on every school trip and holiday together. We had to share many birthday presents, which I felt was unfair to my older siblings, who didn't have to share. That's why we were both happy when we were finally able to go our own ways after leaving school.
Similarity: We twins looked extremely similar as children. Our mother never had any problems - not even when the Lauenburg nurses exchanged our name tapes two days after the birth to test whether my mother would notice. But my father sometimes had difficulty telling us apart when we were a little further away. Then he would shout "Meinert/Hilbert come here!"
Mistaken identity games: When we had gone our separate ways and then bumped into each other again fifteen years later in our academic appointments, we really enjoyed our twin status. My brother took over my job with Herwig Blankertz in 1975 at the Academic Support Centre in Münster - for years to come we met people who hadn't noticed the change of person. When my brother was approached by a colleague who mistook him for me, he used to say: "I don't know you. But I know your problem." And vice versa, when my friend Jürgen Lüthje, then President of the University of Hamburg and former Chancellor of the University of Oldenburg, met my brother Meinert on an Intercity train, he asked: "Is it you - or is it you?"
In Banff and Canada at the same time? In December 1979, I had to stand in at short notice for the Vice-Rector of our university, Friedel Busch, and had the pleasure of joining Detlef Spindler, Uli Steinbrink and Klaus Winter on a business trip to the Rocky Mountains in the Canadian resort town of Banff, where an international conference on teacher training was being organised by the Norwegian Per Dalin. My only task was to give a 15-minute presentation on the Oldenburg single-phase teacher training programme. The decision was made at such short notice that I was unable to cancel the next lecture session (on the topic of "Student-oriented lesson planning"). So my brother jumped in, put on my clothes and marched into the Oldenburg auditorium without coming out, even though, as he told me afterwards, he would have liked to add a note here and there in the lecture text I had prepared: "My brother is wrong here!" Apart from my youngest sister, who was studying in Oldenburg at the time, and four or five students who knew that I had a twin brother, nobody realised the hoax. My brother actually wanted to make it public at the end of the meeting. But he never got round to it because all the students left the auditorium so abruptly after 90 minutes that he didn't fulfil his intention. Years later, I was still being asked whether it was really true that I had let myself be represented in that session. A student came to me a week later and said that I had seemed so strange to her and that she had wondered whether I had had a marital quarrel. There was a student in the lecture who was a member of the radical right-wing NPD. He liked to ask questions and was annoying. We hadn't pointed this risk out to my brother. So, to the surprise of the other students, he responded to his question, which also came up in this session, in a very petulant manner.
Hamburg: Conversely, I stood in for my brother when he was dean at the University of Hamburg in 1996 and had to organise the graduation ceremony for the teaching professions. I had research semesters and was flexible in terms of time. My brother hid in the wings before the event began, I opened the ceremony with a speech about the expectations of the teaching profession and, on an agreed word, my brother joined me and we finished the talk as a dialogue presentation.
We don't have the impression that we have acquired a lack of ego strength through our twin status.[14] The opposite seems more likely to us. We just ticked very similarly, even if there were this or that competitive game until the end, but it wasn't Meinert who suffered from this, but at most his wife Christel, because she - having grown up as an only child - found these games very exhausting.
In 2017, my brother fell ill with a brain tumour and died at the end of 2018.
2.2 Childhood and adolescence
From the age of 3 to 19, I lived in the village of Westerstede in the Ammerland district, initially in a shooting club house that had been made available for refugees,
then from 1954 in a small house on the outskirts of Westerstede that had been newly built with refugee loans: Melmenkamp 21. We twins had our room right at the top under the roof - not really a room at all, but a shed with sloping walls and a bed frame with a mattress on the floor. I got my own room for the first time as a student in 1962.
Ten "children": we were a large household. In addition to the three older brothers already mentioned, two younger sisters, Detje and Dörte, were born in Westerstede in 1950 and 1953. In addition to these five siblings, there were two foster children in our family who were about the same age as me: Hans-Wilhelm Meyer and Dieter Siemen.
My grandmother Wilhelmine Meyer also lived with us throughout my youth. Instead of helping out in the big household, she was constantly being waited on by my mother, she liked to nag and made life difficult for her daughter-in-law. I later commented: "We were at home with 10 children - grandma counted double because she was so cheeky."
- Photo right: Hilbert as a fifteen-year-old in the swimming pool
Swimming band: The swimming pool played a big role for us children in the summer. Meinert and I had already started learning to swim at the age of 4 and gained our free swimmer badge at the age of 5. My parents thought this was important because we lived right next to a swimming pool that didn't have a fence, so there was a risk of drowning as non-swimmers while playing. The twin brothers' speciality was high diving. We got as far as the Auerbach somersault. I could also easily dive 50 to 60 metres. As a teenager, I often crawled 500 metres (10 lanes) or 1000 metres (20 lanes) in a row in the large pool at Westerstede swimming pool. As primary school children, we enjoyed jumping off the 10-metre tower in the marine pool at our grandmother's house, who still lived in Wilhelmshaven at the time. As a precaution, we hadn't even asked her beforehand whether we were allowed to do this.
Open house: We had an open house at in Westerstede at Melmenkamp 21. Many friends and classmates came in and out of our house. In particular, the secondary school's travelling students often stayed at our house when they couldn't get home after evening school events. This was another reason why we didn't lock the front door. After all, someone could come in the evening looking for a place to sleep - and then not everyone had to be woken up. We had foreign guests almost every year - pupils from England orFrance who attended lessons with us. We then made return visits during the holidays . For example, I visited a family in Strasbourg three times who, as I only learnt on my second visit, had been active in the Resistance against the Nazi dictatorship before 1945.
Travelling: My parents never went on holiday - neither with us 8 children nor alone. There wasn't enough money for that. But there were alternatives. In the 8th grade, Meinert and I went on a great cycling trip through Holland with the Protestant youth group of the Westerstede parish and Pastor Hans von Seggern, and in the tenth grade we went on a visit to Dover, London and Cardiff (Wales). From the 10th grade onwards, I often hitchhiked all over Europe with my twin brother during the summer holidays and even as a student: to the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and even Greece. I thought I was in the realm of freedom and enjoyed every one of these trips.[15]
2.3 School and A-levels
From 1948 to 1952, I attended the first to fourth grade of the Westerstede primary school (later renamed Brakenhoffschule), then from 1952 to 1961 the fifth to thirteenth grade of the Westerstede secondary school (later renamed Gymnasium Westerstede). At that time, there were still entrance examinations for secondary school. At the end of the exam week, the examining teachers informed my parents that it would make more sense to let the twins wait another year - they weren't ready for grammar school yet. However, my parents didn't follow this advice. Our grades weren't particularly good throughout school. I received a so-called blue letter twice in middle school because "non-promotion is imminent". I only got a very good grade in sports in my Abitur, but a 4 minus in maths and Latin. The first time I got very good grades - except for the sports grade - was at the end of my PH studies.
My teachers: They annoyed me more than I was impressed by them. Their didactics and methodology were in many ways from the day before yesterday. But I only realised that when I studied to become a teacher myself. The younger teachers[16] made more of an effort, but even then they had a hard time disciplining us. In the 11th grade report card, under "Remarks" for the twins, it said the same thing: "Tends to be undisciplined". My mum then asked what this meant. The answer: "The twins make active contributions, but they chatter in between and don't stick to the agreed rules."
I had one teacher whom I fully respected, even though I got bad grades from him: Oberstudienrat Hennig, a teacher of Latin and history. I only found out much later that he had studied with Theodor Litt in Leipzig before the Second World War, was supposed to be an assistant there, but then never got round to it due to the war and was also unable to do his doctorate with him.
Polit-AG: Together with some of our classmates (they were all boys), we founded a "Polit-AG" and - for the first time at the school - looked into the Nazi history of the town and the whereabouts of the Jews who lived in Westerstede until 1933/45. This work was one of the reasons why I joined the GEW and the SPD immediately after my first exams. I still belong to the GEW today. I left the SPD again during the student revolt - to be more precise, I stopped paying membership fees. I rejoined in 1982. Since then I have had two SPD party books.
Hobbies: When I was in 6th and 7th grade, I received a Kosmos "chemistry" experiment kit. It fascinated me. My favourite thing was experimenting with potassium permanganate because it was great for making oxyhydrogen gas.
I had an aquarium. They bought guppies, swordtails and angelfish for it in Oldenburg. Every now and then I would go to one of the ponds in the neighbourhood to fish for water fleas as live food with a scraper. Or I would cycle to the "Möhlenbült", a pond 4 km away that was dug 100 years ago for the construction of the railway from Ocholt to Westerstede. There I caught a salamander, a caddis fly or a stickleback along with its nest and eggs, from which the young hatched at home and which I could use to feed the angelfish. My speciality later was raising fighting fish. They have a special technique of raising their fry in foam nests that they build with their own spit.
A-levels: At Easter 1961, I took my A-levels at Westerstede Grammar School with 27 other pupils. I was between 5 and 4 in Latin, but still managed to pass.

The Abitur class, language branch: in the second row, first from the right in the second row: Hilbert; third from the right: Meinert
2.4 Career choice
As explained above, I come from a family of teachers. My maternal grandfather and my father were teachers. Four of my siblings became teachers. I have a wife and three sisters-in-law who are teachers. Together, we could have made up the staff of a medium-sized primary school. 14 of the 28 pupils in my A-level class became teachers. The decision to become a teacher was therefore an obvious one. It was already made in year 10. Before that, the usual: First I wanted to be a forester, then a chemist. When chemistry lessons started at school, my interest in chemistry suddenly disappeared. One motivating factor for my decision to become a teacher was probably the fact that, after my confirmation, I became a so-called children's service assistant in the Westerstede Protestant Church and had to tell a Bible story every Sunday and keep twenty fidgety six to twelve-year-old boys quiet. That was fun for me. After-effects can be found in the section "Storytelling" in my book "Teaching Methods".
My career decision never wavered, but I remember that even before I graduated from high school, I had already decided to continue studying after my PH degree. The parallels between my career path and that of my father are therefore obvious.
3 First degree and school service
3.1 Bethel Church College
From the summer semester of 1961 to the winter semester of 1961/62, I studied at the very small ecclesiastical college in Bethel near Bielefeld (200 students), where I passed the Graecum examination, which was approved by a state commission. Studying at Bethel was an offer from our father that three of us children took up. He justified these additional costs on a tight salary as follows: "At the grammar school in Westerstede you couldn't learn what hard work is. But when you have completed the Graecum in Bethel with the Greek professor Krämer, you will know for the first time what real work is." Our father was right, by the way! The professor bullied us, albeit in an amiable way, because he had the ambition to achieve the same level of performance with us students after 11 months as the grammar school for classical languages in Bielefeld had achieved in 8 years. That's why we had to pass the Abitur written exam at this grammar school as our last preliminary exam at the university. My Graecum grade was "satisfactory".
The year at Bethel broadened my horizons, partly because we students were expected to help out in Bethel's hospitals at weekends to relieve the deacons working there. Since then, I have had no fear of contact with epileptics or people suffering from schizophrenia. And the language skills I acquired in the Graecum help me to deal with the many educational terms of Greek origin.
PH Bielefeld: At the same time, I was enrolled as a guest student at the University of Education Bielefeld. My fellow students in Bethel thought it was strange that I was learning Greek to become a primary school teacher. When I once blabbed and said that I could imagine teaching at a teacher training college later on, they laughed at me. So I learnt that "professor" is not a communicable career aspiration, but I never gave up the idea that it was an attractive job.
3.2 Oldenburg University of Education
From the summer semester of 1962 to the summer semester of 1964, I studied at the University of Education in Oldenburg for five semesters. In Oldenburg, I had received credit for two semesters of the part-time programme at the PH Bielefeld, but no examination parts were waived. That's why I only used one of the recognised semesters.
Main subject and minor subjects: I chose German as my main subject. The four minor subjects were history, maths, Protestant religion and English. I chose German because I was a fan of Brecht. Unfortunately, for my lecturer, Prof Hans Lüschen, the serious literature - and only that was covered - ended with Hugo von Hofmannsthal. I didn't know that Lüschen belonged to the Stefan George circle - I had never heard of this circle either. The four minor subjects had to be covered with two credits each, i.e. 4 semester hours per week - better than nothing!

Teaching started in 1962 in the former "teachers' seminary" in Peterstraße, which was built in 1846 - incidentally with a very beautiful wood-panelled auditorium that has been preserved to this day. After two semesters, we all moved to the new building in Ammerländer Heerstraße, which had just been completed and is now the oldest part of the university on Ammerländer Heerstraße.
Rural school internship: I was particularly influenced in my academic appointment by the so-called rural school internship that I completed in the summer holidays of 1962 with fellow student Reinhard Riedel, who had only recently arrived in Oldenburg as a late repatriate from East Prussia. We were assigned to the two-class primary school in Arle/East Friesland. Our mentor was Ellen Riggert. She was the main teacher.

The school building in Arle - behind the three windows in the attic is the workroom, where we two students were accommodated free of charge for six weeks.
We were in the upper class with years 5 to 8, which was taught by Ellen. This meant that we had to do departmental lessons every day and learnt what internal differentiation was right from the start.
Ellen advocated and realised reform pedagogical ideas in her lessons, which she had learnt about during her studies at the Hanover University of Teacher Education. I was impressed by the methodological expertise of the "country kids". In religious education lessons, for example, they were able to identify
different layers of a parable or a miracle story - and most of them did so in East Frisian Platt (which I only partially understood with my knowledge of Oldenburg Platt). Ellen impressed upon us: "As a teacher, you must learn to leave your weapons in the locker." Unfortunately, she later abandoned this principle when she became a primary school headteacher in Oldenburg.
- Farewell from the rural school internship with Ellen Riggert
Every afternoon (!) we had to turn up at the teacher's office during our work placement and usually stayed there for three hours. First we had a cup of tea (good East Frisian with kluntjes and cream). Afterwards, every lesson held in the morning was thoroughly analysed, then the next day's lessons were discussed. Ellen regularly wrote in her lesson logs: "Teacher disrupts the lesson!" And she was almost always right. We were simply still too clumsy and had not yet realised how independent these East Frisian country children were and how many working techniques they had already mastered.
City school internship: After the 1962/63 winter term, it was my turn to do the city school internship. I plucked up all my courage and asked my fellow student Christa Konukiewitz if we wanted to do the internship together. I had known her since the first week of term in 1962,
because we happened to have been assigned to the same group for the so-called Thursday work placement, where we spent one morning a week at school. I wasn't at all sure whether Christa would say yes - but she did.
- In the photo, Christa is teaching our pupils the hand signs for singing a scale.
The internship took place in class 2b at Haarentor primary school (Oldenburg), right next to the PH. Our mentor Gudrun Heise was great, just like Ellen Riggert in the country school internship. She showed us how challenging it is to organise an appropriate spelling and numeracy course in primary school. Since then, I have taken the view that teaching reading, writing and maths is more didactically demanding than any advanced course in a grammar school.
At the same time as the internship, I had my first subject examinations in the minor subjects of English and history because of the semesters I had to take into account. It was tedious, but it worked out, partly because Christa was tolerant enough to take on some of the work I was supposed to do. Our supervisor and marker in the city school internship was the music didact Ulrich Günther. Christa got the grade "good", I got a "satisfactory".
Protestant Student Community (ESG): Christa and I were involved in the student community. Apart from the AStA and the SHB, there was no other student organisation back then that you could get involved in. Joining the ESG was an obvious choice for us because Christa is a pastor's daughter and I also come from a Protestant family. We were both, but not at the same time, student spokespersons for the ESG - a job with a limited workload. The ESG organised camps in the Blockhaus Ahlhorn, but also a close co-operation with the Reformed Protestant Church of East Frisia and - of course - a cabbage trip in winter. The newly appointed first Oldenburg student pastor Peter Wagner from Detmold, with whom we remained friends throughout our lives, left a strong impression. He was clearly on the left - both politically and theologically. We learnt about Dorothee Sölle from him and he explained to us why he was a pacifist.
Excursion to the FDJ in East Berlin: I vividly remember that in 1963 - shortly after the Wall was built - the then AStA of the Oldenburg PH accepted an invitation from the FDJ university group at Humboldt University in East Berlin/DDR.[17] My future wife and I were able to go along. Werner Loch and Hans-Jochen Gamm, then the holders of the two professorships for general education at our university, were also there. Hans Jochen Gamm gave a courageous lecture on school policy.[18] We looked at polytechnic education in an electrical company and discussed it with the teachers. At Humboldt University on Unter den Linden, we discussed educational issues with a relatively large group of education professors. One professor went so far as to claim that, in view of the hostile attitude of the capitalist states in the GDR, an "education to hate" was necessary. We went to the cabaret "Die Distel" one evening and experienced Wolf Biermann's last or penultimate public performance in the GDR. We talked to important people and - what a coincidence - the then GDR Foreign Minister Bolz also dropped in on us, seemingly by chance.[19]
The university teaching staff at the PH: In the 1960s, we had committed and fit professors in Oldenburg, many of whom had made a good name for themselves nationwide a few years later, e.g. Werner Loch (later Erlangen University, then Kiel University), Hans-Jochen Gamm (later Darmstadt University), Erwin Schwartz, founder of the nationwide primary school working group (later Frankfurt University), the art didactician Reinhard Pfennig, the music didactician Ulrich Günther, the didactician Hartmut Sellin, the biology didactician Ernst Kelle and the aforementioned Heinrich Besuden.
Therector of the PH at the time was Hans-Jochen Gamm (photo right), a student of Wilhelm Flitner from Hamburg. Every Saturday from 8 to 10 a.m. we listened to his lecture on general pedagogy. This was followed by Werner Loch's lecture on the history of pedagogy from 10am to 12pm. With his book "Führung und Verführung" (1964), Gamm was the first West German pedagogue to present a comprehensive documentation of Nazi pedagogy. His book "Der Flüsterwitz im Dritten Reich" (1963) was on the SPIEGEL bestseller list for months.
My landlady: I lived in Oldenburg at Von-Kobbe-Straße 33 with Mrs Hahn as a subtenant - a room without a toilet, but close to the PH. She had a rather simple disposition and always got me involved in conversations that I wrote down afterwards.[20]
Mrs Hohn: Oh, that Kennedy is dead, Mr Meyer. That's a shame. He was so young and handsome, so straightforward. I thought he was much better than Hitler. - Can you say that, Mr Meyer?
Hilbert: No, you can't!
Some members of the ESG had visited me the evening before to discuss the programme for the next semester. The next evening:
Mrs Hohn: Mr Meyer, the lodgers have complained. Yesterday evening at half past twelve, three boys and three girls came out of the house. But that's not acceptable so late. I'll be the talk of the town later. Some people have taken nude photos before, and then the landlady had to go to the police afterwards!
Hilbert: But there was a pastor there!
Mrs Hohn: All the worse!
In retrospect, I think the training I experienced at the PH Oldenburg was very positive. We really acquired a lot of the tools of the trade for the teaching profession and also learnt a lot about the theory and history of education. "From practice - for practice" did not apply to us.
3.3 First teacher training exam
I registered for the exam in the fifth semester and passed the "First Examination for Teaching at Primary Schools" on my mother's birthday, 7 July 1964.
Strange grade determination: The overall grade in the exam was "with distinction" - a grade in which three twos and three ones were added together to make a total one, although the internship two had also only been added from a satisfactory and a good. Nowadays, that would never have resulted in an overall grade of "very good" and certainly not "with honours"! I was therefore somewhat surprised by the result. My certificate was signed by the part-time head of the State Examinations Office, the maths didactics expert Heinrich Besuden, my later colleague in the professorship for mathematics didactics.
The exam paper on "The relationship between past, present and future in Schleiermacher's concept of education" was supervised by Werner Loch. I had made an effort because my first written grade at the PH was a "poor".[21]
My second supervisor was Herwig Blankertz. The latter was the philosopher at our PH for four semesters at the time. Only a few students attended his lectures on Descartes, Kant and Rousseau. I was one of the few. That was a stroke of luck for me. Because he offered me the opportunity to do my doctorate with him.[22] And he set the course for my academic career.

Graduation ceremony: The second student in my year to receive a "very good" was Freerk Huisken, who later became a professor at the University of Bremen, where he remained a supporter of a Maoist splinter party for an alarmingly long time and accused me in one of his essays of having fallen prey to the typical late capitalist dreams of reforming the system. So be it - but he could play the cello excellently and enriched the graduation ceremony with it.
There was a great shortage of teachers at the time. In an announcement, the Ministry of Education and Cultural Affairs stated that it reserved the right to claim part of the training costs from those graduates who did not take up a position. This is why the GEW set up a stand in front of the assembly hall at the graduation ceremony, assuring us that we did not need to worry about this.
3.4 Primary school teachers in Ammerland
From 1 August 1964 to 1 April 1967, I was a "teacher for hire" at Ocholt primary school in the district of Ammerland, a small village with perhaps 1000 inhabitants, 28 km west of Oldenburg. There was no traineeship at primary schools back then. I had to take over a full class from day one and teach 30 hours a week.[23]
I was 23 years old and taught 30 lessons a week in all year groups. However, my main focus was on primary school.
I immediately became a class teacher and accompanied a second class for almost three school years, which meant that "my" class had reached the fifth grade by the end of my active school career. I was actually urgently looking for a teacher for the first class, but my headmaster, Mr Grummer, told me: "A first class is too difficult for a beginner!"
First day of school: On the first day of school after the summer holidays, I walked into my 2nd grade class, which had already learnt reading, writing and arithmetic quite well from their previous teacher, Irmtraud Berg, slightly tense. Pupil Carola Wöbken stood in front of the door. She greeted me and said: "My name is Carola. I'll help you." Which was the case.
Everything was new to me. I hadn't studied primary school didactics during my degree and only knew a little about it from the city school internship. The parents were sceptical in the first few weeks of my work, probably also because they were worried about what such a beginner wouldn 't be able to do. But after a few weeks, most of the parents' concerns were dispelled because they saw that I was very hard-working, paid strict attention to the homework[24] and because the pupils obviously enjoyed being taught by me.
Headmaster: The headmaster, Mr Grummer, was a friendly older gentleman who had never heard the word "teaching reform" before, although there was actually a lot to do due to the transformation of his school into a so-called middle school. In my first week at school, he asked me to come round and said: "Let me show you the village!" We then cycled through the village and I was given all sorts of clever tips: "There are deadly nightshades in the hedge! Make sure the schoolchildren don't go near them." Or: "There's a tramp living in that house at the back. Don't get involved with her!"
Mentor: The assigned or self-appointed mentor was Walter Spellig. Again, a stroke of luck for me because he looked after me intensively and advised me, e.g. on disciplinary issues, but also with ideas for language and subject lessons. Mr Spellig had been an aircraft pilot in Rostrup (on the Zwischenahner Meer) during the Second World War, fell in love with the daughter of the Ficken distillery in the village of Lindern near Ocholt and married her. So he stayed in the north. Two years after my time in Ocholt, he was appointed the first seminar leader for primary school teachers in Ammerland.
Keeping discipline: I had discipline problems for a good year and a half. The pupil Angret Hemmieoltmanns contacted me after 14 days,
when things had become quite restless again, and said: "I know something, Mr Meyer: whenever you talk, we are quiet and when we talk, you are quiet." Irmtraud Berg, from whom I had taken over the class, sat in on my request and gave me a tip: "The restlessness in the class doesn't come from the pupils, it comes from yourself." And Walter Spellig told me months later during the big break: "If Egon messes up again, send him to me in class. Then I'll sit him next to his big sister. And she'll be so embarrassed that she'll really beat him up at home!"
Building an experimental attitude: I always had a lot of fun teaching. I often did group lessons. I was always doing little experiments. I tried out the "programmed lessons" that were fashionable at the time with mini programmes I made myself. My favourite subject was general studies - after the end of "local history", this was a field that was still very underused in the curriculum. I was able to experiment a lot. The written seminar paper for the second exam was on the topic of "The didactic problem of early learning in general studies". In order to be able to write the paper, I systematically tried out all kinds of teaching content that was forbidden according to the guidelines. For example, it was - rather moronically - forbidden to deal with the topic of the fire brigade earlier than fourth grade. So I did it in the third. Calculating with x and y was not allowed earlier than fifth grade, so I started in third grade. The result was the distinction between a legitimate "anticipation" in the order of the curriculum and a false "prematurity" based on learning theory.[25]
Action-orientated teaching: In retrospect, I realised that in Ocholt I practised in certain areas what I called "action-oriented teaching" in the 1980 guide to lesson preparation. We had good spatial conditions for this at the school. I was able to use an adjoining room at our school to set up a large model of the village with the children. Incidentally, the adjoining room was a former home of the Hitler Youth, where swastikas could still be seen on the ceiling beams. I often travelled around the village with my class to visit a farm, the large market garden and apple cider factory in Hettenhausen and the railway station. We had our "moss place" in the forest opposite the school, where stories were told from time to time and weekends were organised. Once, as a voluntary homework assignment during the autumn holidays, I set the task: "Build a candy machine out of a shoe box, into which you put a ten-penny piece at the top and a piece of candy falls out at the bottom!" However, this was a real challenge. Only one pupil succeeded - and only with the help of his father.
Free conference: Every 5 to 8 weeks, a group of up to 12 to 20 colleagues from all primary schools in the municipality of Westerstede met for a free conference. We looked at the lessons of one colleague at a time and had a thorough debriefing (in which we were also heavily criticised). Afterwards we had coffee and cake. The school council had no say in these meetings - we were self-organised.[26]
Salary: The starting salary was 530 DM - a lot of money back then. I didn't have a car yet and cycled the seven kilometres to my parents in Westerstede at the weekend. The rent (initially from the village policeman, then in the free flat of the Ocholt nursery school teacher) was DM 50 and later DM 75. On top of that, I had to pay DM 75 a month for lunch at the village inn. I had at least 150 DM left over every month and bought the first radio of my life. I went to the Documenta in Kassel and bought an etching by the tachist WOLS (Wolfgang Schulz) - and then I still had some left over.
Sports lessons: I hadn't attended a single seminar on physical education during my studies - and now I had to teach physical education in second and ninth grade. It was thirty metres from my second grade classroom to the little-used gym. So when the class got restless, I could quickly go over and play dodgeball or do a movement exercise for ten minutes. That almost always worked - after that, the pupils were receptive again. After one year, the pupils were halfway up (photo left), and after two school years, three-quarters were able to climb the climbing ropes in the gym up to the ceiling. The boys in year nine only ever wanted to play football - and I didn't dare force them to do anything else. I didn't even know the rules. So I let them do it.
"You, I know something, Mr Meyer!" I enjoyed the directness and honesty of the primary school pupils. And when they made interesting, funny or sad comments, I immediately wrote them down in a notebook. Three samples:
- Once a mum came and said: "You need to beat Rolf more. My husband is a railwayman and is often away for the week. And I can't do that!" (Once Rolf got a slap in the face from me when I was standing next to him at the moment when he hit his neighbour in the face with his fist without warning. He was completely fine with my reaction, but for me it was a pedagogical defeat that still haunts me to this day).
- German lesson: The pupils were given the task of writing down name words that you can neither see nor touch. I had set this task because some parents were confusing their children with the incorrect rule "Everything you can see is capitalised, everything else is lower case!": After five minutes, Angret comes to me at the desk: "Can I write this: Murderer! - You rarely see them!"
- During a lesson, the pupil Elisabeth comes up to me, presses around and then asks: "Mr Meyer, do you actually have a wife?" Me: "No, but you know that, don't you?" Elisabeth: "I think I have one for you: my cousin. She's still at school and is 19 years old. You can have her. My mum told me not to tell you, but I'm going to!"
3.5 Second teaching exam
On 26 January 1967, I took the 4th grade exam with 44 pupils[27] the "Second examination for the teaching profession at primary schools". I still remember that day well. I had worked through all the lesson plans thoroughly. I had already worn the grey suit with tie two days beforehand so that the pupils, who only knew me in studded trousers, weren't too surprised.
The examination committee consisted of the Ammerland school inspector, Mr Helmerichs, my mentor, Mr Spellig, and Hans-Jochen Gamm, an optional university lecturer from Oldenburg, who I had requested. I had to give three lessons, followed by a technical discussion. The first lesson was German, the second maths. The third lesson on science took twenty minutes longer than planned because the pupils simply didn't realise what was happening physically when the thermometer was put into boiling water and the column in the thermometer rose. Hans-Jochen Gamm then made the pointed remark: "Mr Meyer made us boil unplanned." Nevertheless, the overall performance was awarded a "very good".
Next page: On the day after the exam (and the lively evening exam party, which didn't allow for any more lesson preparation), my students had to write an essay about the day of the exam.
- A sample of the bright student Elke, a pillar of the entire lesson, on the next page!
Bebeamtung: Just five days later, on 1 February '67, I was appointed as a civil servant in the school service of the state of Lower Saxony and was dismissed just two months later, on 31 March '67, because I wanted to start my second degree in Berlin.[28]
The student Angret knew that I would leave the school after passing the exam and wrote in her essay: "Unfortunately, Mr Meyer passed the exam."

Conclusion: The three years in Ocholt certainly had a significant impact on my university teaching. I learnt that lessons need to be prepared intensively, that without clear structuring (feature 1 from my book "What is good teaching?") you miss out on many opportunities for productive learning, that teaching can bring a lot of personal satisfaction and that initial problems can be overcome. That's why I recommend that all Master's graduates who want to do a doctorate in order to become a university teacher for teaching degree programmes do their traineeship first.
4. doctoral studies and work for the Kollegschulversuch
4.1 Just in time - studies at the Free University of Berlin (West)
From the summer semester of 1967 to the winter semester of 1968/69, I studied at the Free University of Berlin and began my doctoral studies with the main subject of educational science
and the minor subjects of philosophy and history.[29] I had been invited to do my doctorate by Herwig Blankertz. It was the time when this potholed rule of not being allowed to ask for supervision yourself had just been abandoned: "... a thousand years of mustiness under the gowns."[30]
- My first book: a collection of essays
Herwig (then still Mr Blankertz) gave me a research assistant position at the Institute for Business Education, which he headed. There I got to know the assistants Frank Achtenhagen and Adolf Kell. Four years later (1971), I published my first book with Frank on a topic that was topical at the time: "Curriculum revision - possibilities and limits".
Student revolt: When I started my studies in West Berlin in the summer semester of 1967, the student revolt that soon spread throughout West Germany began on the campus of the FU. I came from the flat countryside and watched the hustle and bustle of the students - from Rudi and Gretchen Dutschke to Gaston Salvatore, Rainer Langhans and Fritz Teufel - with wide eyes. I enjoyed listening to important people perform live in the Audimax of the Henry Ford Building in Dahlem: Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse and more. I remember that we students courted a pensioner. His name was "Red Rudi", he regularly came to the teach-ins and had shaken Lenin's hand at one point. It was here that I learnt first-hand that there can be a world of difference between your own experience and what is reported in the newspapers.
I tried to read and understand Marx and Hegel, Adorno, Herbert Marcuse and Habermas. That was hard work for me.
Combining my studies with student activities was fun and worried my parents. I never missed a major demonstration. On 2 June 1968, I was there when a demonstration was organised against the Shah of Persia, during which Benno Ohnesorg was shot that evening. I had also stood in front of Schöneberg town hall (the seat of the governing mayor at the time) with a poster with Persian writing that I couldn't read and saw how the Persian secret service SAVAK beat some of us with long poles.
I listened attentively at all the events, e.g. the self-organised teach-ins in the Henry Ford Building of the FU and at the big anti-Vietnam War congress at the TU Berlin in 1968.[31] When there were demonstrations in the city centre, I often took part, but first looked to see where the police had set up their water cannons. Then I positioned myself on the opposite side so that my retreat route was safe.
4.2 Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster - Magister Artium
From the summer semester of 1969 to the winter semester of 1971/72, I studied at the Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität in Münster because Herwig Blankertz had accepted an appointment at this university and had brought Frank Achtenhagen, Adolf Kell and me with him from Berlin. I continued my doctoral studies there. The subjects remained the same: educational science, philosophy and history. I got another research assistant position in Münster and was able to make a good living from it.
In the meantime, the Berlin student revolt had also arrived in Münster - but the revolt did not take place on the streets, as in Berlin, but at the system level: the aim was to democratise the Institute and faculty structures. And Herwig played a decisive role in this.
Magister: In February 1970, I passed my Magister examination in Münster. The subject of my master's thesis was Herwig's topic "The didactic conception of the École Polytechnique in Paris during the French Revolution".[32] I completed my master's degree and examination at a rapid pace because I was to be offered the position of research assistant, for which my PH examination was not accepted as a prerequisite. That's why Herwig had the idea of interspersing my master's degree.[33]
From 1 April 1970 to 30 April 1973, I was then a research assistant at the Department of Educational Science at the University of Münster.
4.3 My doctoral supervisor Herwig Blankertz
Herwig Blankertz (1927-1983) played a decisive role in my academic career. He challenged and encouraged me like nobody else. To this day, he is my role model in terms of how I perceive my role as a university lecturer, even if I cannot and do not want to compete with him in terms of theory production, his critical acumen and educational policy effectiveness. One of his strengths was to inspire very different members of staff for joint projects, to delegate important work, but then to summarise everything and represent it to the outside world.[34]

At the end of 1944, Blankertz was drafted as a seventeen-year-old soldier and was injured (see below). After the war, he first worked as a construction worker, then as a textile worker and engineer. After studying at the College for Industrial Teachers in Wilhelmshaven, he passed his state examination for industrial teaching (specialising in textiles and leather) in 1955. He gained further qualifications and studied for a doctorate under the Göttingen humanities scholar Erich Weniger (1893-1961), which he completed in 1959 with a thesis on the pedagogy of neo-Kantianism.[35] After a period in Hamburg, he became Professor of Philosophy at the University of Education in Oldenburg in 1963, where I met him and his wife Gisela. He moved to the professorship for Business Education at the Free University of Berlin in 1964 and again in 1969 to the professorship for Philosophy and Education at the Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
Herwig Blankertz was the decisive figure at our Institute for Educational Science in Münster at the time. He also played an increasingly important role in the school policy of the state of North Rhine-Westphalia. In 1978, as Chair of the German Society for Educational Science, he organised the Tübingen Congress on the "Relevance of Educational Science Findings for Action" and gave a speech that attracted a lot of attention at the time, in which he analysed the causes of the failure of Brandt-Scheel's 1972 education reform.[36]
He appeared strong on the outside, but he was not a cheerful person, but a fragile one. He suffered when he was no longer able to steer contradictory high-level developments in schools and universities. He felt committed to Willy Brandt's call to "dare democracy". As Dean of Münster, he introduced one-third parity in the Faculty Council and two-parity in teaching committees and ensured that a student became Vice Dean of the School.
Herwig Blankertz campaigned for a defensive democracy - not without a biographical background: as a young boy in 1944, he had listened to the infamous Goebbels speech in the Hasenheide in Berlin and shouted along when Goebbels asked: "Do you want total war?" As a 16-year-old, he became an anti-aircraft helper, as his wife Gisela told me. At the age of 17, he was drafted at the end of 1944. Two and a half weeks before the end of the war, he tried to defend a ruined house near Dessau from the approaching US tanks with a bazooka. He failed. Instead, he was run over by one of the tanks and was left seriously injured. He received makeshift treatment in an American military hospital near Dessau and was then discharged. He made his way on foot to his mother in the Rhineland. His father, a high-ranking Nazi official, disappeared in the final days of the war.
The experience of the Nazi dictatorship left a deep mark on him. When Lutz van Dick, a Dutch special education teacher and poet working in Hamburg, asked him in 1981 to sign the appeal of the nuclear disarmament initiative "Pedagogues against Armament Mania", which he had (co-)founded, Herwig wrote him a long letter explaining why he could not do so.[37] He sent me a copy and asked me to withdraw my signature[38]because democracy could not survive without defence - a position that was not very popular among us left-wing students at the time, but which we look at with different eyes today. His last major lecture was on "Kant's idea of eternal peace". Herwig Blankertz died far too early in 1983 as the result of a road accident.[39]
4.4 Doctorate
On 8 February 1972, my thesis defence took place at the School of Philosophy at the University of Münster in the main subject of Educational Science and shortly before that in the minor subjects of Philosophy and History. The dissertation was entitled: "The Deduction Problem in Curriculum Research".[40] The first reviewer of the dissertation was Herwig Blankertz, the second reviewer was the Münster philosopher Willi Oelmüller. The thesis was graded "summa cum laude". It was published at Herwig's suggestion under the generalising title "Einführung in die Curriculum-Methodologie" (Munich 1972).[41]
The dissertation still characterises my attitude to the theory-practice problem in educational science today. I really wanted to solve the deduction problem, but after two years of work I realised that it could not be solved.
Since then, I have realised that when working on norms and principles in detail, there is not only occasionally, but fundamentally greater leeway than many authors of normative concepts suggest. Every conceivable "derivation" must be processed communicatively, i.e. using hermeneutic methods, and made plausible. This is not possible without additional decisions relevant to teaching. This is why I am still sceptical about didactic models that develop clever concepts at a theoretical level but do not penetrate as far as practical realisation. The final chapter of my dissertation states that the unresolved
deduction problem could also be used for a "partisan strategy", which would then consist of the advocates of a new practice deliberately delivering other (better) normative justifications than the innovative content suggests. This was taken up and sharply criticised by the CDU opposition in NRW at the time and carried through to a debate in the state parliament.

On the day of the thesis defence, 8 February 1972, we celebrated in our flat in the evening. As the printed page from Meyer's guest book shows, my father and mother, my sisters Detje and Dörte, Herwig Blankertz and his wife Gisela, Gösta Thoma (later headmaster in NRW), Hermann-Josef Kaiser (later University of Hamburg), Dieter Lenzen (University of Hamburg), Peter Menck (later University of Siegen) and Adolf Kell (also University of Siegen), Karl-Heinz Fingerle (later University of Kassel) and others attended.
4.5 Chaotic teaching
From the winter semester of 1969/70, I offered seminars at the Institute of Educational Science in Münster on topics including curriculum theory, learning goal orientation and general didactics. The choice of topics was largely left to me. I was able to choose topics that I had to work on for my dissertation project anyway.
When Herwig Blankertz accepted the call to Münster, the Institute for Educational Science at the university was, to put it mildly, run down. There were 11,000 teacher training students with the goal of becoming a grammar school teacher[42]There were far too few staff, hopelessly overcrowded seminars, no courses harmonised with the valid examination regulations and an examination practice in which any subject could be tested. One of the first decisions that Herwig Blankertz enforced after his election as dean was that from then on only "pass/fail" grades would be awarded, because it was simply not possible to differentiate between grades due to the overcrowding in the seminars. In addition, the principle applied: "He who teaches, examines!" As a result, I became a member of the State Examination Office as a research assistant and took 35 to 40 examinations every semester.
Teaching committee: Together with Ulf Mühlhausen, a student at the time (later a school teacher at the University of Hanover), I was Chair of the Teaching Committee, which was made up of equal numbers of lecturers and students. We had to manage the shortage and organise a range of courses as best we could so that the 11,000 students could obtain the two "certificates" they needed to gain admission to the grammar school teaching examination - a laughably low examination requirement in view of the considerably increased demands on the teaching profession even then.
4.6 North Rhine-Westphalia collegiate school trial
From April 1972 to April 1973, I was seconded to the Kollegschule Academic Monitoring Centre in Münster, headed by Herwig Blankertz. From 1 May 1973 to 31 January 1975, I then worked in the same capacity as a research assistant to the North Rhine-Westphalian Minister of Education and Cultural Affairs.[43]
The aim of the pilot scheme was to merge the state's upper secondary schools with the vocational schools into a completely new form of secondary level II school. My areas of work were the supervision of several curriculum development teams, the supervision of a school site (in my case: the town of Ahaus) and the development of an action-orientated evaluation concept. We were an active young team (Adolf Kell, Günter Kutscha, Dieter Lenzen, Karl-Heinz Fingerle, Barbara Schenk, Andreas Gruschka and others) and learnt under Blankertz's guidance that implementing a new type of school is much more difficult and demanding than devising the concept for it.
This is also where my first book with a larger edition, the "Training Programme for Learning Goal Analysis" (1974), was written, a by-product of our supervision of the curriculum commissions of the Kollegschule school experiment, all of which were to produce learning goal-oriented curricula and needed a solid introduction. - In my eyes, this is a sin of youth (see the explanations in section 8.2).

5th marriage - four children - golden wedding anniversary
The private sphere is public. - That was a principle of the 1968 generation, which I don't consider to be entirely correct, but in some respects. That's why, in the middle of this autobiographical report, I'll explain why you can't work full steam ahead for decades as a university lecturer if your family circumstances aren't right.
Christa Konukiewitz, a pastor's daughter from Delmenhorst, and I met in April 1962 in the first week of term
at the Oldenburg University of Teacher Education because we happened to be in the same work placement group (see above). After a cautious process of getting to know each other, we were married on 27 December 1969 in Delmenhorst by my father-in-law Fritz Konukiewitz, pastor at the town church. I have never regretted it! Christa was and is the greatest stroke of luck in my life. And she patiently kept my back free and thus made a significant contribution to me being able to invest a lot of time in my professional work.
Unlike me, Christa had a decent salary at the time of our wedding and she owned a Citroen "duck". In October 1970, we moved to Roxeler Straße 13 (now Sebastianstraße) in Nienberge with our newborn first son Onno in the back seat - the first flat of our own just outside the city of Münster!

Photos: New Year's Eve 1972 on Langeoog
Four children: We have four children, none of whom have become teachers. My wife's ancestors come from East Frisia. So we thought that, in view of the boring surname Meyer, the children could have somewhat rarer first names. Hence the East Frisian names Onno, Gesa, Tiedo and Tale. When the eldest, Onno, was in the 5th grade in Oldenburg, he had to draw the family in English class: "This is Meyer fämeli":

Buying a house: in 1979, when it was clear that we wanted to stay in Oldenburg, we bought a semi-detached house in the Haarenesch neighbourhood. We paid off the loans for 38 years, but have never regretted the purchase. In the meantime, our son Tiedo and his family have moved into the upper flat. So we are a multi-generational house (including grandchildren, cat and sheepdog).

The drawing (1994) is by daughter Gesa
After the family phase, my wife wanted to return to teaching in 1985, but this was not possible because there was extreme teacher unemployment at the time. For 18 years, she therefore worked as an organist and choirmaster in the Bloherfelde/Oldenburg parish. She was involved in the ecumenical peace movement and founded the Oldenburg Ecumenical Centre, of which she was Chair for many years. She was a councillor for the SPD in the Oldenburg city parliament for 10 years. And she has a speciality: she bakes very tasty pizzas with the character of a mound. That's why we've invited an entire seminar to our house for pizza every semester for 30 years. I did the maths at the retirement party in 2009: It was a total of 2200 portions!
Denmark: Every year, we went to the village of Klitmöller in Jutland/Denmark with all our children, my parents-in-law, my twin brother's family, my mother, my sister Dörte and Waltraud and Friedhelm Zubke, who had already become our friends during our PH studies, and spent 4 weeks on holiday there - action-oriented, i.e. with big scavenger hunts.This included big scavenger hunts, Punch and Judy shows (in a children's hut hammered together out of flotsam and jetsam), mushroom picking, lots of swimming and long walks on the beach. Just lying on the beach and dozing off was not our thing. We always came with several families and often rented four or five holiday homes at the same time. We regularly met our Bielefeld colleague Theodor Schulze and his wife Dorothee there. This year (2022) will be the 46th time we have travelled to this village, now with our daughter, our son-in-law, daughter-in-law and two grandchildren, our second son, his partner and two grandchildren, and then my younger sister, my sister-in-law and my godchild. Together we have spent three and a half years of our lives in Klitmöller, and unfortunately we still don't speak Danish.

Meinert Meyer: "View of Denmark's blossom"
Brother Meinert always took oil paint and brushes with him and painted a lot. He once painted a paraphrase of Karl Friedrich Schinkel's famous painting "Blick in Griechenlands Blüthe" (1825), which hangs on our wall in Oldenburg: Schinkel's Greek temple in front, but with a Danish post box, an old brick church from Klitmöller's neighbouring village of Nors (near Klitmöller) on the left and our bathing lake Nors-Sö, also just "around the corner".
Building ship models: I developed a hobby in Klitmöller: I collected scraps of wood from the beach, which were still being thrown overboard in huge numbers off the coast in the 70s and 80s, and used them to build ships for the children, and later also for the grandchildren. Of course, that only worked if I took my toolbox with me on holiday: a rescue cruiser for my daughter Gesa in 1978 and a harbour tug for my grandson Lüko in 2020 - in each case big enough to use the Playmobil figures for playing. The ships float because they are made of wood. But their centre of gravity is so high that they usually tip over very quickly.


Golden wedding anniversary: On 27 December 2019, we celebrated our golden wedding anniversary in the "Krömerei" in Westerstede with 75 relatives and 15 friends in the "closest family circle".

Now we are getting old together, as the photo from 2020 (taken in our garden in Kastanienallee in Oldenburg) shows, and the first age-related ailments are making themselves felt.
6 Professors at the Carl von Ossietzky University
6.1 A professorship in Oldenburg - what more could you want?
The first professorship I applied for, I got straight away. [44] That was the full one[45] professorship for school education (then H4, then C 4 and even later W 3) at the newly founded Carl von Ossietzky University, which was not yet allowed to be called that because the FDP had pushed through in the coalition agreement with the SPD that the name of the Nobel Peace Prize winner, who was not a communist but stood for a broad alliance with all left-wing forces, should not be chosen. It was Gerhard Schröder who, immediately after taking office as Minister President of Lower Saxony in 1981, passed a law allowing universities to give themselves a name.
The PH Oldenburg, where I had studied, was integrated into the new university. This meant that I ended up in my father's former position (see above, point 1.3) and that I was assigned a number of colleagues, some of whom I had sat in seminars with 11 years earlier and two of whom had even examined me.[46] Unlike at the University of Bremen, where there were decades of heated disputes between the staff of the old PH and the new academic appointments at the university, the PH integration in Oldenburg went surprisingly smoothly. We lecturers did not organise ourselves into two blocs of "old PH" and "new university", but along common university political factions, ranging from SPD and DGB representatives (of which I was one) to the undogmatic left (especially supporters of the Frankfurt School of Sociology, with whom I enjoyed working a lot in the years to come) and Marxists close to the Stamokap. There was no CDU-affiliated group of university lecturers at the University of Oldenburg in 1975, but there were allegedly two lecturers in the natural sciences with CDU party membership. At the beginning we met once a week, later much less frequently, in these groups at 8.00 pm to discuss the situation.
Appointment committee: As I received a file containing all the confidential documents from a member of the appointment committee twenty years later, I can easily reconstruct how the selection decision was made and what the balance of power in the committee was. The Chair was the lovely colleague Ilse Mayer-Kulenkampff (1916-2008), a social pedagogue[47]who did not want to harm anyone and therefore considered the fierce disputes between the university teacher factions to be more of an evil. Other members of the commission were the philosopher Rudolf Lengert, the psychologist August Schick and the sociologist Gerd Vonderach as well as the secret string-puller in the commission, the holder of the professorship for General Education Hans-Dietrich Raapke, who, like my doctoral supervisor, had completed his doctorate under Erich Weniger. The mid-level representatives were Gustav Denzer (who, like me, came from Lauenburg/Pomerania) and Friedhelm Zubke (with whom I had completed my PH studies). The student representatives were Gudrun Patel (member of the MSB - Marxist Student Union Spartakus) and Hans-Joachim Schwebe.
"Audition": I remember my audition in the summer semester of 1974 very well and I was very excited. I had chosen my field of work at the time (setting up an integrated upper secondary school as a continuation of the comprehensive school at lower secondary level) and developed a proposal on how a collegiate school could be set up in Oldenburg. In the ensuing discussion, Gerd Vonderach, who wanted to see a candidate other than me, Johannes Beck, in first place, asked: "You mentioned Niklas Luhmann in your presentation. Can you explain again what you meant there?" My answer: "You caught me at my weakest point. I haven't yet thoroughly familiarised myself with Luhmann's systems theory!" Six months later, Herbert Hasler (former assistant to Erwin Schwartz and then a university lecturer in Oldenburg) came to me and said: "I was at your lecture. At the point where Gerd was heckling you, I said to myself: That's exactly the right person for us, if he can admit so openly that he doesn't know something."
ELAB commitment: Every applicant for a university teaching position in Oldenburg was asked whether they were willing to participate in the development of the project-based teacher training programme at ELAB (see below). Of course, everyone answered "yes" to this question because otherwise they would have had no chance of getting a place on the list. My former fellow student and assistant to the rector at the time, Meinard Tebben, had informed me about this beforehand so that I could prepare myself thoroughly for this question.
Fellow applicants: Christine Möller (later University of Siegen), Johannes Beck (later University of Bremen), Hans-Dieter Haller (colleague of Karl-Heinz Flechsig, University of Göttingen), Karl Frey (Kiel), Hans Glück (later University of Cologne) and Kurt-Ingo Flessau (later TU Dortmund) had applied for the position.
My most "dangerous" competitor was my Swiss colleague Karl Frey (1917-2011). At that time, in 1974, he was already Director of the Institute of Educational Sciences in Kiel (IPN). With his habilitation (which I lacked) and a highly remunerated position in Kiel, he was formally far superior to all other applicants. If he had been on the list, the SPD Minister of Education at the time, Jost Grolle (previously a history teacher at the Oldenburg University of Teacher Education), would probably have preferred him, even if Johannes Beck or I had been in first and second place and he had only been in third place. However, the committee decided not to put him on the list in the first place because they were convinced that he only wanted to "silver" his Oldenburg reputation, i.e. use it to improve his Kiel salary in negotiations to stay.[48]
Johannes Beck (1938-2013), who shortly afterwards received a professorship at the University of Bremen, was the second young scientist to be nominated for first place. He belonged to the "undigmatic left" and was therefore more left-wing than me. The two students voted against me because I was too close to the bourgeois camp. The middle peasants and the majority of university lecturers voted for me because they thought my profile was suitable and trusted Herwig Blankertz's verbal and written judgement. He then also wrote one of the two expert reports, a copy of which he sent to me confidentially and wrote: " ... with one laughing and one crying eye".
List of three: Hans-Dietrich Raapke originally favoured someone else for first place, but when he saw that a majority in the commission was in my favour, he changed his mind. So there was a list of three: 1st place: Meyer, 2nd place: Beck, 3rd place: Glück.
Call given and accepted: In autumn 1974, I received an inconspicuous letter from Minister of Education Joist Grolle. It consisted of just two sentences: "I am offering you the H4 professorship in school education at the University of Oldenburg. Please get in contact with my advisor Kronshage." Of course I accepted the offer, even though it was hard to say goodbye to the academic support at the Kollegschule in Münster. But coming back home to Oldenburg had an irresistible appeal for my wife and me.
There was no reason to be overconfident: The fact that I got the first job I applied for was largely due to the fact that in the 1970s, a good 30 new universities and colleges were founded in Germany in one fell swoop as part of Brandt-Scheel's university and education reforms. Most of them - as in Oldenburg - emerged from PHs. Almost all of these new universities had teacher training degree programmes. As a result, young educational academics who were eligible to apply at the beginning of the 1970s had very good chances, even if they were not habilitated. By 1978, the situation had become much more difficult and from 1980 onwards, almost all vacant positions in Schools of Education were cancelled without replacement.
6.2 Commencement of employment and chair
I took up my new post at Carl von Ossietzky University on 1 February 1975 and held it until my retirement on 1 October 2009. Even after that, I continued to work on the basis of my emeritus status.
At first I had no place to stay at all. The large AVZ building on Uhlhornsweg was still under construction. So for the first 12 months I was given asylum in Faculty 2, in the room of Meinhard Tebben (art didactician and assistant to the Rectorate at the time) and Prince Rudolf zur Lippe (Professor of Aesthetics in the subject of Visual Communication).
After a year, I moved into my first office on the 5th floor of the AVZ (now A 4) - a rather modest 3 x 5 metre space, but with a beautiful view of the city.
The administration had neglected to order the furniture for the newly occupied new building. As the photo shows, I made the room a little more cosy with privately procured furniture. The door, which can be used as a chalkboard for planning meetings, was very helpful. When I complained to my colleague Hans-Dietrich Raapke in a corridor meeting that I had no furniture, he said laconically: "That's how it is here. You get a chair thrown at you, but you have to wait for a chair!" It wasn't until 1989 that I moved from the fifth to the first floor of the same building into a much larger office (see point 6.4).
No assistants of my own! I have never had my own assistant in my entire professional life. At the time, we wanted to establish grassroots democratic university structures, promote flat hierarchies and eliminate the old dependencies of the assistants on the professors. That wasn't automatically a disadvantage. It forced me to look for cooperation partners on a voluntary basis. And for the most part, I succeeded.
Student assistants and research assistants - a pleasure! There were no assistants, but I was able to regularly hire student and research assistants (see point 9). The assistants didn't actually do any work as assistants in the conventional sense, rather they were heavily involved in my courses. This is shown in the photo of the lecture session with the assistant Manfred Schewe (point 6.4). The assistant Eva Pilz, with whom I am still friends today, told me years later: "You really exploited us - but we learnt a lot."
A number of these assistants then also contributed to publications: e.g. Karsten Friedrichs and Eva Pilz on the book "Unterrichtsmethoden", Andreas Feindt on a collection of essays on action research, Werner Jank, with whom I gave the lecture "Einführung in die Didaktik" in 1991/92, as co-author for the book Jank & Meyer "Didaktische Modelle" (see section 8).
Excessive demands? I was 34 years old when I received the call. That was still a young age at the time - only my later president Michael Daxner had already been awarded a professorship at the University of Osnabrück at the tender age of 28. I remember being a little afraid of my own courage and resolved to take on the professorship for three years "on trial" in order to then decide whether or not I was up to the job in the long term. After three years, this decision was clear to me.
6.3 Pilot programme for single-phase teacher training (ELAB)
From the first semester of the university's foundation (summer semester 1974), the Oldenburg model experiment for single-phase teacher training (ELAB) was carried out, which attracted nationwide attention.[49] When I arrived in Oldenburg, the plans had largely been finalised. From February 1975 to the summer semester of 1985, however, I was intensively involved in the implementation of the plans. These first ten years of involvement in integrative teacher training had a strong influence on my way of teaching.
Contact teachers: An important element of the ELAB pilot project were the "contact teachers" - teachers from the region who were released for ten teaching hours to participate in the practical training of Oldenburg students. These were always exceptionally committed people from the university's catchment area, whose contribution to the success of the pilot scheme can hardly be overestimated. Many of them later became head teachers and/or department heads.
Participating teachers: After the pilot programme was discontinued, the successor model of the participating teachers was introduced. They only had a leave of absence of 2 hours. I worked intensively with both groups. I still have a lasting friendship with Liane Paradies and Johannes Greving. Dorothea Vogt, for example, officially helped organise my lecture "Introduction to School Pedagogy". This resulted in books no. 15 and 16 printed by ZpB (see the HOMEPAGE file "Publications: Books"). A particularly large number of contributing teachers - sometimes up to twelve - participated as team members in the BLK pilot project on team research (see section 7.4). Without them, we would never have been able to carry out this broad-based practical research.
Lack of examination regulations: For the first three years, we didn't even have examination regulations for the single-phase programme. - The Ministry of Education and Cultural Affairs had simply not managed to do it any faster. But that wasn't a disadvantage because we had a lot of leeway and could actually do whatever we wanted in terms of topics and forms of work.
Cancellation: In 1976, after the change of government from the SPD to the CDU in Hanover, it was decided to cancel the Oldenburg pilot project, although it was cost-neutral and was positively evaluated in the final report by Kurt Ewert, Carl-Ludwig Furck and Werner Ohaus (1981) commissioned by the Ministry of Education and Cultural Affairs of Lower Saxony. However, the pilot programme continued for a number of years because the enrolled students had a legal right to complete their studies.
Bicycle demo: In 1976, when the new state government decided to make drastic cuts to the expansion plans for the University of Oldenburg that threatened its very existence, we organised a bicycle demo with the entire university (1,000 students, 100 professors). We cycled across the flat countryside from village to village and from region to region all the way to Hanover, camped on campsites or in the meadows of shooting clubs and then demonstrated in front of the state parliament. The media response was tremendous. The bicycle demonstration is widely documented in the university's annals. So just a discreet note: because I had taken my 6-year-old son Onno with me on my bike (see photo), I only travelled as far as Wildeshausen.
Conclusion: To this day, I consider the single-phase teacher training programme to be a forward-looking model for teacher training in the 21st century that is by no means utopian, but can be realised with certain modifications. Unfortunately, the opportunity given in 1990 to extend the single-phase system practised in the GDR to the whole of Germany during the reunification of the FRG (old) and the GDR was not utilised.
6.4 Project study
In the first years of the pilot scheme, project studies were at the centre of the entire teacher training programme. Large project groups were formed, consisting of up to 120 students, up to 15 teachers and 15 contact teachers.
SPASC: My first project, which ran for two years with 12 teachers and 120 students, was entitled "SPASC - student-orientated project work as school-based curriculum development". It was there that I got to know my colleague Ingo Scheller, among others. I learnt a lot from his concept of scenic play and copied several forms of work, which were then included in the book Unterrichtsmethoden (1987). In the SPASC project, I quickly became the person responsible for lesson preparation and evaluation. A precursor to the book "Leitfaden zur Unterrichtsvorbereitung" (Guide to lesson preparation) entitled "Rezeptbuch für die schriftliche Unterrichtsvorbereitung" (Recipe book for written lesson preparation), written jointly with Ingo Scheller, was produced in this project.
BASEK (basic competences for the secondary level): Rüdiger Semmerling and I set up a second, much smaller project in 1980/81 with other teachers and just under 40 students. We analysed school structures, but also travelled to universities in the Netherlands twice: once to Groningen to the Rijksuniversiteit with John Peters, then to Amsterdam to the Vrije Universiteit with Jacques Carpay.
September 1980: BASEK students hold an information event at the ATEE conference (Association for Teacher Education in Europe) organised in Oldenburg, where they provide information about the core elements of ELAB and lament the discontinuation:

Teaching practice semester of the single phase: In the third study phase, which roughly corresponded to the traineeship, the single-phase students completed their practical teaching semester at one of the school locations of the pilot scheme. The practical examination took place at the end of the programme. All lecturers were involved in supervising this phase.
Exam preparation: The thorough general and subject-specific didactic training of the single-phase students was vital in the ELAB model experiment because the students often encountered hostile grammar school head teachers in the practical teaching examinations who considered the single-phase training to be a Marxist-inspired misconstruction and were usually very harsh in their censorship. They were concerned that the high proportion of educational and social science content could jeopardise a thorough specialised education. They also felt that it was inappropriate that large sections of the professors in Oldenburg socialised with the students. They feared cronyism.[50]
Graduate study? Unfortunately, there is still no serious graduate study on ELAB students. Due to the many contacts I still have with these former students today, I am certain that those who were given a position despite high teacher unemployment in the 1980s - contrary to the fears of a number of department heads - coped very well with their tasks. Hundreds of them became head teachers years later, others were successful in the private sector.
6.5 Focal points of academic work and teaching activities
In my 47 years of university teaching, I have familiarised myself with five specialist areas and represented them in research and teaching:
- General didactics (since 1975)
- Teaching methodology (since 1981)
- School pedagogy (since 1988)
- Action research (since 1994)
- School and lesson development (since 2000).
These specialisations are also reflected in my book publications.
Interpreter - not an empiricist: I am not an empirical teaching researcher, but a didactician trained in the tradition of educational theory. I have not carried out any empirical studies of my own, apart from the team research (point 7.4) which is still to be outlined. A significant part of my academic work has consisted and still consists of acting as an interpreter of important research findings and writing textbooks for students, trainee teachers and experienced teachers, in which standard tasks of the teaching profession and development issues in schools are described. I recognise the importance of interpreting work. It does little to advance the development of educational theory, but it facilitates its reception by those who matter, namely practitioners in schools.
Lectures: From the very beginning, I have given lectures, as is expected of a professor - and always with great pleasure.[51] When we still had the 9 - 11 a.m. and 11 a.m. - 1 p.m. timetable in the mornings, I lectured from 8 a.m. to 9 a.m.. That didn't hinder student participation in any way. Later it became two-hour events, often with activity-orientated parts - as in the photo of Manfred Schewe, then my research assistant, now at the University of Cork/Ireland, giving a module in the lecture on Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi in the university auditorium:

Lecture WiSe 1992/93: "Pestalozzi" with Manfred Schewe
Scripts: For every lecture session until my retirement, I wrote a 10 to 20-page script, had it printed at the university's printing centre, stapled it at home with the help of my wife and then distributed it to the students at the beginning of each session. When, in 1980, the first detailed checks were made on who distributed how many print jobs, I stood alone at the head of the entire university. Two advantages of this way of working: Students did not need to buy expensive textbooks and I was able to turn the thick collection of scripts that was produced each semester into a textbook, which was then printed by the Centre for Educational Professional Practice. This is how the "Guidelines", the "Teaching Methods" and the "Didactic Models" were created (see section 8).
Courses offered: Here are a few excerpts (from the course catalogues from 1975 to 2006) of the courses I offered, which at that time were still published every semester as a printed book. My compulsory teaching load consisted of 8 semester hours per week. It was often 10 hours, but never more than 11!
Summer term 1975:
- Lecture: Introduction to curriculum research
- Project plenary SPASC (= student-orientated project teaching as school-based curriculum development)
- Project-orientated course (only for SPASC members): Preparation of project lessons
- Seminar: Holiday didactics and everyday lesson preparation[52]
additionally from 1977:
- Supervision of single-phase students "on site" in their schools, where they complete their practical teaching semester and take their examinations.
Winter term 1989/90:
- Lecture: Introduction to general didactics
- Seminar: Preparation for the general school internship
- Seminar: Supervision and evaluation of the general school internship in Leipzig[53]
- Seminar: Body language in the classroom
Summer term 1994:
- Lecture: Teaching methods
- Seminar: Preparation for the general school internship
- Seminar: Supervision and evaluation of the general school internship
- Compact seminar: Future workshop for teacher training
- Doctoral colloquium
Summer term 2000:
- Seminar: Preparation for the general school internship
- Seminar: Supervision and evaluation of the general school internship
- Seminar: Introduction to team research
- Seminar: Bilingualism and action orientation in foreign language teaching (together with Heike Rautenhaus, Faculty 11)
- Doctoral colloquium
Winter term 2003/2004:
- Lecture for module 1.01.02 of the Master's degree programme: Introduction to School Pedagogy (together with Hanna Kiper, Wilhelm Topsch and tutors)
- Seminar: Exercises on teaching methodology
- Seminar on team research
- Preparation for the general school internship
- Doctoral colloquium
Winter term 2005/2006:
- Lecture with exercises: Characteristics of good teaching (with participating teachers)
- Seminar on team research
- Preparation for the general school internship
- Seminar: Teaching and learning at lower secondary level
- Seminar: Preparation for the oral pedagogy examination
- Doctoral colloquium
Action-orientated seminar work! I have always found great satisfaction in preparing seminars together with the students. There were hardly ever any "normal" presentations in my seminars. I assigned the seminar topics to a team of 3 to 5 students and arranged one or two preliminary meetings with them. The students then had to plan the course of the seminar session with me, lead it themselves, give the theoretical input and organise the regular small group work.

June 1993: Compact seminar on action-orientated teaching
A feedback round took place immediately after the seminar session. The team of students then received a collectively marked course certificate for all of their partial performances. Andreas Feindt (now at the University of Münster), with whom I still work a lot today, told me 15 years ago: "Hilbert: I didn't find your lectures that exciting! What has stuck with me are the joint planning sessions!"
New study: In my new, much more comfortable lecturer's room on the first floor of building A 4, which I moved into in 1989, there was a large table for the planning meetings, as the photo below shows, and an old chalkboard on the left, which the caretakers organised for me and screwed to the wall.[54]

My lecturer's room from 1989 to 2009
Off to Berlin to the Humboldt University? In 1991, on the initiative of my colleague Dietrich Benner, I was invited to apply for a professorship in school education at the Humboldt University in Berlin. I was signalled as having good chances by the head of department of the Senator for Science. I briefly wavered as to whether I should accept this interesting enquiry, but in the end I stayed in Oldenburg. In Berlin, I would presumably have become responsible for practical school studies again sooner or later and would then have had to invest a lot of energy in organising the Institute, which had to be radically reduced in terms of staff and restructured in its working methods after reunification. I told myself that, given my profile of expertise, it would be wiser to stay in Oldenburg, teach and write books. The decisive factor, however, was my wife Christa, who said: "You can go to Berlin - but me and the children will stay here!" That decided the issue, even if I still think about whether it was a somewhat selfish decision.
Workload: I enjoyed working a lot until I retired. And even after that, it didn't fundamentally change. To this day (2022), I simply act as if I haven't retired yet. But I enjoy the freedom to decide for myself what I do and where I turn down one of the requests that are still coming in (lectures, visiting professorships, doctoral supervisors). Until I retired, "a lot" meant that I worked through the week until Sunday evening and started again on Monday morning. However, from 1990 onwards, when the children were out of the house, I took a nap practically every day - 30 minutes, never longer.
Workaholic? Some of my friends say I'm a workaholic. I disagree because I don't feel addicted, because work benefits others and because I don't hide my "illness". As Karl Marx analysed, self-determined work serves self-realisation. And Theodor Adorno once remarked somewhere that professors don't need holidays because they can organise their workplace autonomously.[55] I tend to agree with that. The work can be very satisfying. There is also a lot of room for manoeuvre in the university teaching profession, but if you abuse it, it soon leads to social isolation in the School.
6.6 Internship supervision
From the beginning of my teaching career, i.e. from 1975 to 2009, I offered a preparatory seminar for the internships every semester, first for the practical phases of the ELAB, then for the first general school internship (ASP) in the old teacher training examination regulations and then in the Bachelor's degree programme. This included supervising the students during the semester break and then holding a joint evaluation seminar. Initially, 4 hours of the teaching load were set aside for this, but after the changeover to the BA/MA programme, there were only two hours per week per semester - in my opinion a mistake and a great annoyance. It's no wonder then that on-site supervision and evaluation of internships are sloppily carried out due to sheer lack of time.
- Practical teaching semester in the ELAB: From 1975 to 1985, supervision within the framework of the ELAB model experiment consisted primarily of supervising the so-called practical teaching semester, which was concluded with the integrated first and second examinations. There, we teachers had functions that the subject leaders at the study seminars have today. We travelled a long way because the students' locations ranged from Emden and Leer to Oldenburg, Nordenham and Delmenhorst, and from Verden to Cuxhaven. Then I would set off in the morning, often at 6 a.m., to get to the schools in time for the start of lessons. These many classroom visits had a strong influence on my "Guidelines for lesson preparation" (see section 8 below), which I wrote at the time.
- General school internship in the two-phase teacher training programme and in the BA/MA programme: From 1973 - parallel to the ELAB model trial that was coming to an end - the "normal" degree programme, which was to be completed with the state First Teaching Qualification Examination, was reintroduced. In our department, I was responsible for organising the general school internship (ASP) included in the course and always enjoyed doing so. There was a chronic shortage of teaching hours, which only ceased with the introduction of the Bachelor's/Master's degree programme, because from this date onwards, capacities were calculated at our university for the first time, so that additional staff were hired during the current semester when enrolment numbers at our Institute were too high, albeit in exploitatively poorly paid positions[56].
A highlight - internship in Leipzig: In the summer holidays of 1991, with the active support of Edgar Rausch from the PH Leipzig (see below, point 7.6), we moved the general school internship to Leipzig in order to study the working conditions of teachers in this period of absolute upheaval and at the same time to make our first attempts at teaching. It was a memorable experience for everyone. We were accommodated in an empty floor of a hall of residence in Leipzig-Grünau. And Detlef Spindler from the ZpB (see section 7.1) covered the travel expenses.
6.7 Dean's Office
Out of a sense of duty and not because I felt like it, I ran for the office of dean, was elected and held the office for two years (from 1989 to 1991) and then, due to the illness of my successor, Erich Westphal, for a further semester in 1993.
The university press office took a photo (left) of each newly appointed dean for UNI-INFO. The soul of the departmental office was Ingrid Wiese, who was great to work with

(photo centre). She was joined by Edith Suhrkamp (right), who was just as friendly and knowledgeable. The two of them guided us deans through difficult waters time and again.
Co-operation with the GDR: The reunification of the GDR and FRG took place in the middle of my time as dean. I still remember well how, in the autumn of 1989, Professor Regine Pauls from the Mendelssohn-Bartholdy Academy of Music in Leipzig suddenly stood in the doorway, unannounced, and said: "I'm Regine Pauls. I come from revolutionary Leipzig. I would like to make contact with you!" And that's exactly what she did. More on this in section 7.6.
Demonstrations against the IRAQ war (second Gulf War): There had also been fierce demonstrations in Oldenburg against the US war in Iraq in January 1991. Oldenburg students occupied the Pferdemarkt on 19 January and paralysed all traffic for half a day. The police had a lot to do, but it remained peaceful. I then invited the police chief at the time, Police Director Achim Borne, to our department at the university to discuss the police operation and the right to demonstrate at a panel discussion that I organised together with the AStA. This was reported in detail in the NORDWEST newspaper on 25 January 1991.
University ranking - 1st place for our department: A highlight of my time as dean came at the end of 1989 when the Centre for Higher Education Development (then in Hanover) carried out the first nationwide ranking of the teaching and research quality of (West German) Schools of Education. To the surprise of many other universities, my department was ranked at the top, ahead of Bielefeld, Tübingen and FU Berlin. The media response was great. A Chinese and two Japanese people dropped by to inspect our department. We were a little proud of this, even if it turned out afterwards that the data basis for this first ranking was still very thin. But in later rankings we were still in the top group!
6.8 Doctoral supervisors
Since 1975, I have supervised doctorates in Oldenburg and written doctoral and habilitation reports. You can find a list on this HOMEPAGE. The reason for compiling this list was a question from the Chinese doctoral student Lin Ling: "How many doctorates have you supervised?" - I didn't know, but then got to work.
From 1977 to 2022, I supervised a total of 45 doctorates and assessed them as the first reviewer. There were also 32 second reviews and 26 habilitation reviews. That's quite a lot! But Wolfgang Klafki from Marburg, who provides the benchmark for all of us, had twice as many first reviews. Hartmut von Hentig is at the other end of the scale. He hardly looked after his doctoral candidates and only managed to get four or five people through to their doctorate. A group photo was taken after each thesis defence (up to two hours, with five professors). Below is the photo of Andreas Feindt's thesis defence (now: University of Münster).

2006: Completion of Andreas Feindt's thesis defence[57]
I am currently organising the doctoral colloquium together with Barbara Moschner and my chair successor Till-Sebastian Idel.[58] It continues to be fun, even if there was one dramatic event.[59]
On the next page is a scan from Meyer's guestbook, We celebrated Ye Xuping's graduation at Kastanienallee 40 on 13 February 2017. Like many Chinese women, Xuping is a little superstitious. That's why she was worried about the date of Friday the 13th. But it worked out perfectly.

From left to right: Sylvia Jahnke-Klein (examiner of choice), Wolfgang Fichten (examiner of the related subject), HM (first assessor),
Ye Xuping, Ulrike Krause (Chair), Barbara Moschner; second assessor
Professorships of "my" doctoral candidates: Quite a number of the doctoral candidates (first and second evaluations) have since been awarded a chair or have been appointed associate professors, e.g. Falk Rieß, Ingo Scheller, Irmhild Wragge-Lange, Klaus Klattenhoff, Wolfgang Fichten (all at OL University), Rainer Bromme[60] at the University of Münster, Werner Fölling at the University of Dresden, Christian Wopp in Osnabrück, Ulf Gebken in Essen, Simone Seitz in Bremen, Frank Hellmich in Paderborn. Many of my Oldenburg doctoral candidates also have chairs abroad: Haimo Fensterseifer (University of Santa Maria, Brazil), Manfred Schewe (University of Cork, Ireland), Manfred Pfiffner (PH Zurich), Catherine Walter-Laager (University of Graz: where she is now Vice Rector), Ye Xuping (University of Hefei in Anhui Province, PR China).
6.9 Doctoral travelling squad
For sixteen years, I cooperated with Volker Wendt, one of my former doctoral candidates, who was responsible for the organisation of the doctoral colloquium together with Barbara Moschner
and also coached several doctoral candidates.[61] He had the idea of visiting some of the doctoral candidates abroad. As a result, we both travelled (at our own expense) to Japan, Bolivia, China and Greenland for lectures and further training.
Japan: In 1999, we visited Nobuyuki Harada in Japan, who had plans to do his doctorate in Germany (Hildesheim or Oldenburg). At the time, he was a lecturer in educational science at the University of Kumamoto. He then moved to Gifu University and is now a professor at Nagoya Municipal University. We looked at lessons and I gave a lecture.

Kumamoto (Japan) 1999
Bolivia: In February/March 2001, Volker Wendt and I were in Bolivia - first at the German School in Santa Cruz, then at the German School in La Paz, at the Goethe Institute in La Paz and with our doctoral student Barbara Heiß, who was working on the topic of "Inclusive teacher training in Bolivia". We visited the UNESCO-supported Mariscal Braun primary schools in El Alto (above La Paz at an altitude of 4100 metres) with her (photo).
China: In March/April 2006, Volker and I were invited to China for the first time for lectures and further training, namely to the East China Normal University in Shanghai (to Xu Binjan), to the German Studies Department at Nanjing University (to Ni Jenfu) and to the School of Education at Anhui Normal University in Wuhu (Anhui Province). In Shanghai, Volker and I visited Huang Xueyuan, a German studies doctoral student in Oldenburg. In Wuhu, we gave lectures at the university and discussed the dissertation project of Ye Xuping, who is doing her doctorate with me.
In the meantime, I have been to China eight times to visit universities and schools. The visits to Chinese schools were always highly interesting and irritating for me at the same time: as their top rankings in the PISA studies since 2009 prove, the Chinese have managed to achieve high cognitive learning success in competence-oriented tests with strongly teacher-centred teaching, but also with a high willingness to learn, even enthusiasm for learning, which we are far removed from in Germany. However, simple imitation is out of the question for me. The question remains as to whether and if so what we could do better here than we have done so far.

The picture on page 62 was taken in 2016 and shows the speakers at the 12th Curriculum Conference at East China Normal University in Shanghai: front row, second from left: Manfred Pfiffner, third Catherine Walter-Laager, fourth HM; third from right: Andrew Porter, USA).
More about the travelling squad on my HOMEPAGE in the file "School and teaching visits on five continents"!
6.10 Examination activities
I have done a considerable amount of testing throughout my professional life. I started examining when I was a research assistant at the University of Münster (see point 4.5). It was difficult for me to give a "four", but I was more than happy to give an "A" and often thought about how satisfied I felt with my first "A" at the end of my PH degree programme. I roughly calculated the scope of the exams:
(1) Eight semesters of oral examinations at the University of Münster: around 30 exams per semester = 240 exams
(2) Supervised exam papers in Münster: around 20 in total
(3) Practical teaching examinations in the ELAB in 12 semesters (from 1979 to 1985): approx. 60 examinations
(4) EG examinations: integrated oral examinations in educational science and social science (from 1979 to 1985): approximately 200 examinations
(5) conventional oral examinations in pedagogy in the two-phase degree programme from 1982 to 2009 (27 semesters): approximately 25 cases per semester = 675 examinations
(6) Examination papers for teaching qualifications from 1982 to 2000: approx. 5 per semester = 90 papers
(7) Master's theses at the University of Oldenburg from 1997 to 2009: approx. 5 per semester = 60 theses
(8) Master's theses in the School Management degree programme at Kiel University from 2007 to 2017: 5 per semester = 55 theses.
In total, there were around 1400 examination cases. One consequence of this volume of examinations was that, from the 1990s onwards, in practically every school I visited in north-west Germany for internship supervision or further training, I came across several, sometimes a dozen, teachers who had taken an examination with me.
6.11 University representative for examination matters
From 1990 to 2009, with a brief interruption, I was the university representative for the Oldenburg branch of the State Examination Office of Lower Saxony.
- Even before my appointment, I had worked intensively and with great pleasure with Hans Krull , previously a school councillor in Delmenhorst - a schoolmate of Walter Kempowski from Rostock and a courageous person who intervened courageously, especially when grammar school heads gave unfair grades in single-phase teacher training, or made extensive use of his right to compose the examination committees in advance.[62]
- After Hans Krull came Mr Rikowski - the relationship with him was somewhat more distant.
- Until the State Examinations Office was closed in 2009, I then worked with the former head of secondary school in Edewecht, Mr Konrad Barth. That was again very constructive.
My job was to be an ombudsman for the students, to mediate in conflicts and to deal with overarching issues together with the head of the branch office and the president of the Examinations Office in Hanover.
Every semester, I organised information events for all student teachers in the auditorium, which was always overcrowded. The topic: "How do I prepare for the oral pedagogy exam?" - There was always a simulation of a pedagogy exam with "real examiners" and a "real candidate"; in this case it was my student Ilka Parchmann (not in the photo), who is now a chemistry didactician at the IPN in Kiel:

1992: Information event in the overcrowded auditorium with simulation of an exam (in the centre Mr Rikowski, on the right HM)
I was allowed to take part in all the teacher training examinations at the University of Oldenburg and did so repeatedly at the beginning of my career, especially in the subjects of maths and science. Some of the experiences were irritating because not all colleagues were really attuned to their exam candidates for a long time.[63] However, I had excellent experiences in the subject examinations of maths didactics expert Michael Neubrand. His exams were competence-orientated. He wanted to know whether and to what extent a student could already put themselves in the position of a secondary school pupil and formulated clever reflection tasks for this.
The office was a labour-intensive task, especially since the invention of the internet and the possibility of sending emails. I received enquiries about all kinds of problems on a daily basis. Every now and then I would talk to colleagues about their examination practices, which was not always received with enthusiasm. That's why I wrote on the opening page of my HOMEPAGE in 2009: "I'm happy about every email that doesn't reach me." That is now a thing of the past. And I am happy to receive enquiries, comments, criticism or whatever.
7 Co-operation
A professorship in school education offers a wide range of opportunities for co-operation with other university institutions, with schools in the region and with national institutions. I have enjoyed and personally benefited from this from the very beginning.
7.1 Centre for Pedagogical Professional Practice
The cooperation with the Centre for Pedagogical Professional Practice and its director, Detlef Spindler, was always particularly important and satisfying for me.
He has a very high level of social communication skills and has always managed to bring very different colleagues together for productive work.
Another member of the ZpB was the geography didact Wolfgang Schranke, who organised the university's PÄDAGOGISCHE WOCHE (PW)
organised by the university every autumn, which offered a wide range of further training in school education and was attended by several thousand teachers. I repeatedly took part with lectures and workshops.
Hansjürgen Otto also worked at the ZpB, whom I already knew from my FU studies in Berlin. He was a reliable partner for the students and advised them on conflicts at their internship schools.
The next photo on the page shows teacher Sabine Nolte (currently Chair of the Osnabrück District Staff Council) on the podium at the PW event with students: "Schule 88 - voll ätzend?" (School 88 - sucks?)

Pedagogical Week 1998: "School really sucks?" (left: Sabine Nolte)
7.2 School reform centre
From 1992 to 2006, I was the scientific director of the School Reform Centre (AS) at the Centre for Pedagogical Professional Practice at the University of Oldenburg - an institution of the Ministry of Education and Cultural Affairs that was intended to support school development in the region and test evaluation models. To this end, the then SPD Minister of Education, Rolf Wernstedt, seconded teaching hours to the ZpB - initially four teaching posts, later two. There was an advisory board, initially headed by the Osnabrück head of department Otto Menzel, later by RSD Ernst Wille (Oldenburg) and RSD Klaus Kapell (Wildeshausen). At regular intervals, we organised closed meetings together with the advisory board, at which not only the work plan for the following year was prepared, but also a current topic of teaching development was discussed.
Schortens: The activities of the AS included the establishment of learning workshops, participation in internal teacher training programmes (SchiLF) and the Schortens headteacher conferences, often with more than 350 participants, for which we invited nationally and internationally renowned experts: Heinz Rosenbusch and Stephan Huber, Annemarie von der Groeben and Susanne Thurn from the Laboratory School, Jürgen Baumert, Klaus-Jürgen Tillman, Hans-Günter Rolff, Peter Posch from Klagenfurt and Michael Schratz from Innsbruck, Pertti Kansanen from Helsinki and Mats Ekholm from Sweden, the neuroscientist Gerhard Roth from Bremen. Comment from Ha-Gü Rolff, Dortmund: "We envy you for what you have built up in SCHORTENS!"
I enjoyed working with Ina Ulrich, Christel Wopp, Wilm Renneberg, Alida Baumann, Franz Wester and many other seconded teachers. I never understood the AS management task to mean that I was the guiding light. It was more important that the seconded teachers were able to contribute their strengths and develop them further:

Retreat with the AS at the historical-ecological education centre in Papenburg
7.3 "Teacher training" research workshop
In 1994, I organised a compact seminar entitled "Future Workshop School". The result was that the students (Carola Junghans, Andreas Feindt, Bettina Kappelhoff and Anne Eckermann, among others) were in favour of setting up a university school.[64] and a teacher training research workshop.
Wolfgang Fichten, Alexandra Obolenski and I, as lecturers, joined forces with this initiative and founded the Forschungswerkstatt Schule und Lehrer*innenbildung - a joint venture between Faculty 1 and the university's Didactic Centre (formerly ZpB).
The tireless soul and head of the research workshop was Wolfgang Fichten (here at a closed meeting of the Nordverbund Schulbegleitforschung). The main task of the research workshop was to establish the "base station" for the experiments to establish our team research model, which started at the same time.
Nordverbund Schulbegleitforschung: From the research workshop, we also organised the Nordverbund , which still exists today under the name Nordverbund Praxisforschung.

Several northern German universities and teacher training institutions have joined forces in this organisation. The first initiative came from Ingrid Kemnade from Bremen.
7.4 Oldenburg team research and BLK pilot project
We refer to Oldenburg team research as a further development of the model of self-organised action research(collaborative action research) developed by Herbert Altrichter and Peter Posch for German-speaking countries. Herbert was in Oldenburg several times and patiently showed us how to do it.

1994: Herbert explains the principles of action research
While the Austrians had individual teachers research their own teaching practice, in Oldenburg we formed teams right from the start, in which 3 to 7 students worked together with one participating teacher (see above) to investigate an important teaching problem or school development task.
We had developed a process model that the individual teams - each consisting of one teacher and four, five or six students - could follow.

We started with a compact day (on Saturday and Sunday morning) in which we were introduced to four research methods for data collection that were suitable for our objectives: Questionnaire, Interview, Structure Laying Technique and Group Discussion. This was followed by a long phase of work in the individual teams - on site at the teacher's school and at the university. We ended with a presentation day on which the 6 to 12 teams in a cohort were able to present their research results and then all received a certificate as a "team researcher".

Certification of the KGS Wittmund team
BLK pilot project: From 2000 to 2005, we received a total of 250,000 euros in funding as a pilot project from the Bund-Länder Commission (BLK) of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs - also thanks to the commitment of Alexandra Obolenski and her good contacts with Green politicians in the Ministry of Education and Cultural Affairs of Lower Saxony.

Photo page: Members of our BLK moderation team: Ute Warm (supervisor), Carola Junghans (seconded teacher),
Ulf Gebken (in a coordination position) and his successors Ela Eckert and Uta Wagener.
We trialled our team research concept in the study programme (which continued to go very well), but also - together with the teacher training colleges in Aurich and Leer - in the second phase of teacher training (which was tedious given the closely timed training stages of the teacher training colleges).
We all enjoyed the work very much. Unfortunately, the monograph on Oldenburg team research that Wolfgang Fichten and I wanted to write after 2005 (and for which we already had a promise of publication from Cornelsen-Verlag) never materialised. However, there are many essays and three collections of essays describing the model.[65]
7.5 GDR contacts and reunification
I had no relatives in the GDR and therefore only got to know the GDR until 1989 when I travelled to Berlin for the FDJ at Humboldt University (see point 3.2 above). From 1984 onwards, however, I had intensive contact with Lothar Klingberg (1926-1999). I had sent him my book "Leitfaden zur Unterrichtsvortbereitung" (Guide to Preparing Lessons). In my first reply, he wrote that he was pleasantly surprised that I had refrained from the usual West German malice against GDR teachers in my book.
Lothar Klingberg: After traumatic experiences as a 17-year-old soldier. [ 66] Immediately after the end of the Second World War, he became a "new teacher" (without or without completed training) at the primary school in Otterwisch near Leipzig. He then studied again at the University of Leipzig under the philosopher Ernst Bloch, among others, obtained his doctorate there and then habilitated with a thesis strongly influenced by Herbart on "Pedagogical Leadership and Self-Activity in the Socialist School" (1962)...[68] He moved to the "Karl Liebknecht" University of Education in Potsdam and became the leading and world-famous general didactician in the GDR.[69]
In 1986, at the invitation of Otto Lange (School 1) and myself, Lothar was in Oldenburg for the first time to give a lecture at the university. One sentence from his lecture has stayed with me: "Students are responsible for their teachers' sense of achievement!"
In 1989, my wife and I visited Lothar and his wife Renate for the first time. At the time, they lived with their two sons in Sanssouci Palace Park, in the former pheasantry, where two official flats had been set up for the teacher training college housed in the palace park's New Palace. The conductor and composer Wilhelm Furtwängler had previously lived in the flat. In the bedroom under the roof where I was accommodated, the aluminium strips still hung, which Furtwängler used to protect himself against evil earth rays.
A walk in Sanssouci Palace Park with Tonka the dog;
the pheasantry in the background.
In 1990, I tried to convince my School and the University Senate of Carl von Ossietzky University to award Lothar Klingberg an honorary doctorate from our School in order to make a small contribution to shaping the content of reunification. This failed because the three-quarters majority required in the University Senate was not achieved - partly due to a very unprofessional information policy on the part of the then Chancellor.
In 1990, Dorothea Vogt (then KGS Wittmund) and I organised a training course for the lecturers at the IG Metall educational institutions in Berlin. We took the opportunity to visit Lothar in the castle park in his flat with the entire metalworkers' group:

1991: left: Dorothea Vogt, in the centre Lothar Klingberg, right HM
Leipzig: I had further contacts - arranged by Lothar - with Edgar Rausch (1928-2016) in Leipzig.
In 1986, he had recommended to his university friend from his Leipzig days that he invite me to Leipzig to give a lecture at the Clara Zetkin College of Education. But it took another three years because the Stasi - acting through the Director of International Affairs at his university - forced him to withdraw the invitation several times.
- Left: Edgar Rausch, school teacher from Leipzig (1989)
In February 1989, I was finally allowed to enter the country and thus became the first West German guest speaker at the Clara Zetkin University (in the beautiful buildings in Karl-Heine-Straße, which were modelled on Bauhaus architecture).

My visa: directly from
Margot Honecker's
Ministry of Education
The lecture topic proposed by Edgar Rausch was: "Teaching methodology". I was able to refer to the preliminary work of Lothar Klingberg. Nine months later, I found it irritating that in February 89 I had not yet realised how close the end of the GDR was and what a significant part the courageous people of Leipzig would play in it. Renate Klingberg and Elisabeth Fuhrmann told me afterwards that they had already sensed the imminent end a year or two earlier from the social behaviour of ordinary people. They had less and less respect for the authorities.
Pedagogical Academy of Sciences - Elisabeth Fuhrmann: In 1987, at the suggestion of
Lothar Klingberg, I made contact with Elisabeth Fuhrmann from the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences (APW) in Berlin.[70] She was head of an Institute established in the Heinrich Heine School, right next to the Berlin Wall.
She had been thwarted in her career because she refused to leave the Catholic Church and join the SED.
Otto Lange and I invited her to Oldenburg in 1987. Here too, the Stasi intervened and instructed Elisabeth's boss, Professor König from the APW, to ensure that Elisabeth refused the invitation with pretexts (see the instruction on the right).[71]
DGfE conference: In June 1990, Elisabeth Fuhrmann organised the first all-German conference for the Didactics Commission of the German Society for Educational Science (DGfE). We met at the Heinrich Heine Secondary School, where we were also able to observe lessons. For everyone involved, it was a powerful experience of a school system undergoing radical change.[72]
Reunification: On the day of reunification, 3 October 1990, the PÄDAGOGISCHE WOCHE was taking place at the University of Oldenburg. I had arranged for Elisabeth Fuhrmann to give the opening speech. Elisabeth Fuhrmann gave an impressive speech in the auditorium about the prospects of a new beginning. We had also invited many other GDR colleagues as speakers.
The evening before, my wife and I invited all our GDR colleagues (Elisabeth Fuhrmann, Regine Pauls, Johanna Faust, Ralf Hickethier,
Uwe Wyschkon and Edgar Rausch from Leipzig, Esther Migge from Saßnitz and others) to our home to celebrate my birthday (2 October). In the evening, we built a "New Year's Eve rocket" (see section 1.2 above) out of matches, sparklers, wax and spray fountains and lit it at 11 o'clock in the evening. The Warsaw Pact flag was emblazoned on the left of the rocket and the NATO flag on the right. Both were burnt. But at 11.45 pm, three quarters of our guests suddenly said goodbye. The melancholy was probably too strong for them to want to celebrate the end of the GDR with us with loud cheers and a glass of champagne.
Interim professorship: In the winter semester of 1996/97, Elisabeth Fuhrmann took over the interim professorship in Oldenburg during my research semester. (I wrote the book "Schulpädagogik" during this time).
To summarise: in the first years of reunification, contacts in the new Federal States were close and cordial. I was in Leipzig and Dresden, Potsdam and Stralsund several times. The contacts loosened, mainly due to the fact that two of my closer contact institutions were "wound up" and all staff were made redundant: the APW in Berlin and the PH in Leipzig. In return, new co-operation partners were added, who repeatedly invited me to teacher training courses:
- Parey secondary school in Saxony-Anhalt, invited several times by Anita and Klaus Krüger
- the state institute ThILLM in Thuringia, invited by my former Master's student Marion Tröster from Kiel
- the state institute LISA in Halle, as part of the headteacher qualification programme in Saxony-Anhalt
- the Association of Protestant Schools in Saxony, where one of my student assistants, Uwe Schmidt, had become headmaster in the meantime
- Kreuzgymnasium in Dresden, invited by its headmistress Gabriele Füllkrug
- the Eichsfeld Gymnasium, invited by Marina Parlitz.
In the state of Brandenburg, where many things were different than in the other new Federal States, the Karl Liebknecht University of Applied Sciences was not wound up but integrated into the newly founded University of Potsdam. This gave me the opportunity to maintain closer contact with the primary school teacher Ursula Drews from Potsdam.
I also worked closely and productively with Witlof Vollstädt (formerly of the University of Karl-Marx-Stadt) for more than ten years on the jury for the Cornelsen Foundation's "Teaching and Learning" award (see below, point 7.10).
7.6 Research Training Group "Didactic Reconstruction"
From 2001 to 2006, I was a member of the Oldenburg Research Training Group "Didactic Reconstruction" - a highly interesting initiative
by the Oldenburg colleague and biology didactics expert Ulrich Kattmann. Together with Ulrich Kattman, Michael Neubrandt, Dietmar von Reeken, Astrid Kaiser and others, we organised a doctoral-specific course in two cohorts. The international final symposia, which were largely organised by Barbara Moschner, were excellent. For example, I was able to meet Richard Ryan, who many people know from his self-determination theory of motivation, which he co-authored with Edward Deci. At the initiative of Michael Neubrand and myself, Xu Binjan from East China Normal University in Shanghai also attended the first symposium.
I was enthusiastic about this form of doctoral funding. I would have loved to have had something like this 30 years earlier as a doctoral candidate myself! The interdisciplinary cooperation between the many different subject and general didactics experts is exemplary in my eyes.
We lecturers also learnt a lot from each other.
7.7 Lecturer training for IG Metall
From 1986 to 2016, I worked for IG Metall every year - with brief interruptions - to organise a one-week or three-day training event for the lecturers at the five IG Metall training centres - mostly in Sprockhövel, sometimes also in Berlin-Pichelsee, Bad Lohr or Bad Beverungen.
In 1986, the executive board of IG-Metall under its then Chair Franz Steinkühler decided to reform the entire educational work of IG-Metall.[73] They wanted to move away from the rigid course system (Labour I, Labour II, Capital 1, Capital 2) and work in a more target group-oriented way. Steinkühler's lecturer was therefore sent out to find new training lecturers.
He asked Ingo Scheller (also Oldenburg) and myself, among others. Ingo had other priorities, but I agreed immediately and have built up a stable co-operation over the years.
The colleagues at the training centres were highly professional. The seminars were a challenge for me every time. I also used them to try out new training topics and methods. One of the products of this collaboration is the book I wrote together with the trade unionists Martin Allesbach and Lothar Wentzel[74] published in 2009 in the book "Politische Erwachsenenbildung" (Publications "Books" No. 37).
7.8 Master's programme in school management at Kiel University
From the summer semester of 2007, I was an external member of the faculty of the Master's degree programme in School Management at the Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, which developed this degree programme in cooperation with the Institute for Quality Development Schleswig-Holstein (IQSH). The person pulling the strings was the then Director of the IQSH, Thomas Riecke-Baulecke (President of the Centre for School Quality and Teacher Education Baden-Württemberg since 2020), who worked on me until I had given my approval.
It is an accredited Master's degree programme that concludes with a written Master's thesis. Participants are expected to have several years of previous professional experience in the school sector. Many of the students intended to qualify for a school management role, while others were already headteachers. A number of the students worked at German schools abroad. Just as many came from abroad. For example, I established contacts with the German-speaking Mennonites in the Gran Chaco in Paraguay through the Kiel student Ernst Eitzen (see "School and teaching visits worldwide" on this HOMEPAGE).
MODULEV: Together with the chemistry didactician Reinhard Demuth and the IPN research assistant Claudia Fischer, I was responsible for MODULE V "Improving and assessing teaching". Each semester there was a two-day face-to-face event and several online seminars. Part of the task was to write a module handbook with the same title. It was published in two volumes by Oldenbourg Verlag in Munich (see publication list no. 38 and 39 on this HOMEPAGE). Each semester I supervised five to seven Master's theses and set 25 to 40 written exams and assessed them together with Claudia Fischer. The work was very varied and instructive. Following their studies in Kiel, two graduates completed their doctorates with me in Oldenburg and at the University of Osnabrück: Christian Geldermann, now a school inspector for the dioceses of Münster and Aachen; and Christina Peters, seminar leader for vocational schools in Schleswig-Holstein.
I retired from active teaching in Kiel in 2017. However, my examination entitlement remains in place and is used from time to time.
7.9 LABORATORY SCHOOL Advisory Board
The work of a university lecturer involves this and that advisory board activity (see the list in the appendix of the file "Academic and scientific career"). My membership of the advisory board of the LABORSCHULE Bielefeld from 1992 to 2017 was particularly important, but also labour-intensive.
Our task: After Klaus-Jürgen Tillmann took over the scientific management of the Laboratory School from Will Lütgert, the teacher-researcher model of the Laboratory School developed by Hartmut von Hentig was changed. Teachers were no longer given blanket leave of absence for research tasks,
but only temporary leave of absence for research and development projects (FEP). Project proposals had to be written for this. The most important task of the advisory board was to discuss these proposals with the applicants and make suggestions for improvement. This task was fulfilled at the annual two-and-a-half-day advisory board meetings.
In 2017, I was then dismissed from the advisory board in a small ceremony organised by the students and colleagues of the Laboratory School.
7.10 CORNELSEN Foundation Teaching and Learning
I was on the advisory board of the CORNELSEN Foundation "Teaching and Learning" for 20 years. The photo taken on the balcony of the Cornelsen publishing house in Berlin shows us with the Chair of the Advisory Board, Ruth Cornelsen.
Our task was to assess financial applications to the Cornelsen Foundation and make recommendations. Franz Cornelsen had entrusted the management of the foundation's funds to the Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft. As Chair, Mrs Cornelsen gave us a free hand and was happy for us to argue the pros and cons of individual proposals.

The members of the Advisory Board 2002: HM, Helmut Schwarz, Ruth Cornelsen, Elmar Tenorth and the representative of the Stifterverband
Cornelsen SponsorshipAward: From the advisory board function, I then became the spokesperson for the jury for the Cornelsen Sponsorship Award. Individual teachers or teams of teachers with interesting school projects could apply for the three prizes, which were endowed with 6000, 4000 and 2000 euros. The only requirement for the application, determined by the purpose of the foundation, was that the project had to be scientifically supported.
As with the laboratory school, the jury's work was very instructive, because here you could "hear the didactic grass grow". Many developments that later seeped into mainstream schools were thought through and trialled by the award winners at an early stage.
Every year or two, the winners we selected from the many applications were then invited to DIDACTA in Stuttgart, Cologne or Hanover. They had to present their award-winning project on stage at the school forum. A member of the jury then gave a laudatory speech. In addition, each of the three winners received a cash prize from the foundation's assets. Proud as Oscars, the winners then travelled home again and usually ensured that there was a report in the local media.
8 Publications
8.1 Liaison with the Cornelsen publishing house
It is a right of university lecturers to combine academic work at the university with the publication of research results. I have utilised this right to the full. In purely quantitative terms, however, my list of publications is significantly shorter than that of several of my Oldenburg colleagues. I have concentrated on textbooks and academic records, each of which had and still has a broad target audience. A complete list of publications, updated until 2022, can be found on this HOMEPAGE. The total circulation of the monographs published by CORNELSEN Verlag Berlin in particular amounts to just under 1.4 million copies today (in 2022). In view of the current total of 880,000 teachers in Germany, this is quite a lot, which occasionally causes astonishment.[75] The high figures are also thanks to the director of Cornelsen-Scriptor-Verlag Berlin, Horst Linder, who has worked tirelessly for the distribution of my books.

Horst Linder at the Frankfurt Book Fair in 1991 at the presentation of the newly published book Jank & Meyer "Didaktische Modelle" (Didactic Models)
Almost all of my books are based on concrete teaching-learning contexts. This partly explains why readers occasionally praise the books' high level of comprehensibility. A former student, who is now head of the Eichen Gymnasium in Scheeßel (Lower Saxony), invited me to a lecture and said: "Hilbert, I often disagreed with you - but at least people could understand you!" Managing Director and former Oldenburg student Gerhard Müller made a similar point when he invited me to speak at the Regional Vocational Training Centre for Business (in Kiel) in 2016 and 2022.
Of course, there was and still is some criticism, sometimes of the often casual and sometimes flippant tone and the sometimes ironic images (e.g. by my colleague Klaus Prange), but also of the theoretical underpinning of my teaching concepts, which was considered insufficient. Wolfgang Klafki, with whom I was able to work on the advisory board of the LABORSCHULE Bielefeld, told me at a meeting that he had repeatedly defended my books against attacks from colleagues.
When Franz Cornelsen, the founder of the publishing house, was awarded an honorary professorship by the city of Berlin in November 1987, he invited many of his authors to the award ceremony at Schöneberg City Hall. There were solemn speeches about the indeed impressive entrepreneurial activities of the honouree, until Michael Klett, owner of Klett-Verlag and main competitor of Cornelsen, and yet a friend of Franz, gave a witty speech and explained that he also had such a title, that you couldn't really do anything with it, but that it was helpful if you wanted to book a hotel room somewhere. After the award ceremony, there was a banquet in the tower block next to the Berlin Memorial Church - and all the invited guests were photographed:

November 1987: HM, Mr Thiele (head of Hirschgraben Verlag), Franz and Ruth Cornelsen
8.2 Longsellers
Bestsellers are nice - but longsellers that are available in bookshops for a long time and then also achieve high total print runs are more important for publishers and also for practical university work and training in the second phase. In this section, I outline some of my longsellers and their genesis. Whether and, if so, what influence such books have on teacher training has not yet been empirically recorded. I would be very interested in such a study. However, I am no longer able or willing to undertake such painstaking work myself.
(1) "Training programme for the analysis of learning objectives (1974): It is a youthful sin from the time of my involvement in the North Rhine-Westphalian pilot project for the collegiate school, which made it to the 14th edition (see above, point 4.6). The book came about because the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs (KMK) had stipulated that all new curricula should be designed with learning objectives in mind. Therefore, the question was how learning objectives could be appropriately defined and then also "operationalised"[76] was therefore an important question for practitioners in the curriculum commissions and for trainers in the second phase. I speak of youth sin because the topic and aim of this book systematically shortens the focus on the question of objectives, even if this deficit is pointed out here and there in the book, e.g. with the thesis that "emancipation cannot be operationalised".
(2) "Leitfaden zur Unterrichtsvorbereitung" (1980): From 1978, I gave a lecture
"Einführung in die Unterrichtsvorbereitung" every second semester and produced a script for each session (see above). This then became the preliminary version of the guide published internally by the university's Centre for Pedagogical Professional Practice (picture left). It was passed on by colleagues (not by me!) to four publishers: Klett-Verlag, Westermann, Urban & Schwarzenberg and Scriptor Athenäum (then an independent publishing house in Königstein/Ts.). All four publishers wanted to print the manuscript. I then wrote a joint letter to the editors and explained that I would give the rights to the publisher who offered the lowest retail price.[77] Scriptor won the race by a clear margin.[78]

Since then, I have been friends with the editor responsible for Athenaeum Scriptor at the time and current publishing director Horst Linder of CORNELSEN SCRIPTOR. In 2007, I undertook a thorough revision of the book. There is now also a Chinese edition.
To Horst Linder's delight, the guide sold well and slowly found its way into the Second Phase seminars. At that time, the book was almost unrivalled in terms of its practical relevance compared to the didactics of Klafki, Derbolav, Geisler, Heimann and others, which were written in an academically demanding style. As a precaution, however, I wrote in the foreword to the eighth edition: "High circulation figures are no proof of quality. I do not infer the quality of the BILD newspaper from its circulation figures, but I do infer that it fulfils a need."
Holiday didactics? In the "Leitfaden", Wolfgang Klafki, Gunter Otto, Wolfgang Schulz and Christine Möller, leading figures in general didactics at the time, are derided as "holiday didactics". Wolfgang Klafki had no problem dealing with this judgement from a young bung. Wolfgang Schulz was, as he told me later, really annoyed and wrote a whole essay to put my attacks in perspective. But that didn't stop him from offering me the first name when we became co-editors of the Enzyklopädie Erziehungswissenschaft (see below). Today, I would not repeat such a criticism of holiday didactics, because the latest publications by me (and Carola Junghans) demand a much higher level of self-reflexivity from students and trainee teachers - not easy fare for beginners. But we stand by this because the demands on reflective teaching behaviour have risen sharply over the last 40 years. 35 years ago, I went to work with great optimism. In the introduction to the guide, I wrote: "You can learn to teach well. You can learn even more to prepare your lessons well." This is still my position today - but, as I said, the demands on students' and trainee teachers' ability to reflect have increased.
Criticisms: The most biting criticism of the guide and my other publications came and still comes from my fellow doctoral student and Diplom-Pädagogik graduate Andreas Gruschka (now an emeritus university lecturer in Frankfurt/Main). I had got to know him in the Kollegschulversuch in Münster. Andreas wrote that I was a "gravedigger of didactics" and almost as bad as Heinz Klippert. His reasoning was that I was taking the readers' own thinking away from them and only reformulating what they already had stored in their wealth of experience. I don't see it that way, even if I readily concede that an academic debate on the quality criteria of advice literature is overdue. However, this should be backed up as empirically as possible and not just serve to reproduce the core statements of Andreas' Adorno-oriented "negative pedagogy" (Gruschka 1988).
Much Enemy, Much Honour: Attempted Ban by the Lower Saxony Minister of Culture! The university's internal advance version of this book was leaked to Werner Remmers, the then CDU Minister of Education, who I otherwise held in high esteem, by the head of the grammar school department in the Osnabrück district government (all with the same party affiliation) and was sharply criticised.[79] As a result, the then Rector of the University of Oldenburg, Rainer Krüger, received an unusual instruction, even in these heated times, in which he was asked to ensure that my text was not used in teacher training programmes at the University of Oldenburg. The rector rejected this with reference to the freedom of research and teaching guaranteed by the Basic Law.
The guidelines were also debated in the state parliament. Werner Remmers criticised it; Rolf Wernstedt, later SPD Minister of Culture, but at the time still in opposition as the SPD parliamentary group's education expert, defended it. I then listened to a lecture by Remmers at the congress of the German Society for Educational Science in Göttingen in 1980. He made a fiery plea in favour of his concept of a decree-free school. After the lecture, I dared to go up to him and asked him why he had sent this decree to my headmaster. His answer: "Don't take it too personally! I was dependent on powerful groups."
Name dispute - also on the guide! In 1974, the university wanted to give itself the name Carl von Ossietzky University because this Nobel Peace Prize winner had been imprisoned and tortured nearby in the Esterwegen concentration camp. However, the name was banned by the state government. I had deliberately disregarded this in agreement with the publisher and had the following printed on the back of the guide : "Hilbert Meyer, Professor of School Education at Carl von Ossietzky University". I received a letter from Ansgar Holzknecht, then personal advisor to the Minister of Education, which was polite in tone but harsh in substance, saying that I was not authorised to do this. However, I did not change the spine of the book in subsequent editions!
(3) "Teaching methods" (1987): During my studies and also in the doctoral phase, I was not interested in methodological issues. That changed when I realised in 1975 in Oldenburg how important a building block professional teaching is. Since then, teaching methodology has been my favourite subject.
The two volumes published by Cornelsen Scriptor were based on lectures on the subject of "Teaching Methods", which I gave for the first time in the winter semester of 1981/82 and then published in book form in May 1982 together with the two assistants Eva Pilz and Karsten Friedrichs at the Centre for Pedagogical Professional Practice at CvO University.

1982: Karsten Friedrichs, Eva Pilz and I celebrate the publication of the methods book
After several rounds of lectures, the scripts continued to swell and a two-volume edition was published in 1987:
- The theory volume provides a systematic reconstruction of the concept of methods.
- The practical volume describes the methodological tools used by teachers.
At that time, as analysed in the new edition from 2022 (2022, p. 199 f.), there was an almost effervescent theoretical discussion about the phenomenon of "teaching methods". This discussion came to an abrupt end at the beginning of the 1990s. Since then, there has not been a single monograph on the theory of method. However, the topic remains highly relevant for teacher training practice.


The book covers in order: 1st ed. 1987, 10th-16th ed. 2002 to 2021; Japanese edition 1998; Chinese edition 2011
In 1982, when I was familiarising myself with the subject area, I noticed that West German didacticians such as Wolfgang Klafki, Wolfgang Schulz and Rainer Winkel were imprecise and incomplete in their didactic terminology. Herwig Blankertz then gave me the West German licensed edition of Lothar Klingberg's "Introduction to General Didactics" published by Fischer Athenäum and I was surprised: no other author was more precise when it came to the conceptualisation and systematisation of teaching methodology. I therefore turned to him for advice and was very grateful that he accompanied the creation of this book and meticulously commented on and criticised many chapters. This resulted in a friendship until his death in 1999, for which I am still grateful today.
In the meantime, more than 300,000 copies of the practical volume and more than 200,000 copies of the theoretical volume have been printed. The Japanese edition had two print runs, the Chinese edition several reprints. Now, after 35 years, a new edition was overdue, which I undertook together with my former student assistant and current seminar leader Carola Junghans (Meyer & Junghans 2021; 2022).
(4) "Didactic models" (1991/2002): The Frankfurt music teacher Werner Jank, who has now also retired, studied music in Oldenburg from 1991 to 1994. His partner and current wife, Gaby Schröter-Jank, studied with me and said to him: "Go and see Hilbert!" He did and we immediately agreed that he would get a position as a research assistant and give the lecture "Introduction to General Didactics" together with me. We tried to provide students and trainee teachers with an overview of the current state of didactics at the time. The cover pages in order: the university edition 1990; the first Cornelsen-Scriptor edition 1991, the 5th revised and abridged edition 2001 and the Danish translation 2003:

In the conception of the book, we have orientated ourselves strongly on Herwig Blankertz' "Theories and Models of Didactics" (1969), but have then tried to increase comprehensibility by using new text types, graphics and more, but have also made a clear thematic expansion. There are new chapters on the acquisition of competences, the concept of learning, constructivist didactics and action-oriented teaching. The first three chapters have been translated into Swedish by Michael Uljens (Vaasa/Finland).
(5) "What is good teaching?" (2004): This is the only book that I didn't actually want to write. It came about like this: I had recommended Horst Linder to publish a book on the subject of "teaching quality" after the German PISA mess of 2000. And I also suggested two authors to him. The first suggestion was Andreas Helmke, who was working at the University of Landau at the time. But Andreas Helmke had just signed his contract with Klett-Kallmeyer for the book "Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität" (Teaching Quality and Teacher Professionalism); it was published there in 2003.
The other author I suggested made an exposé for the publisher, according to which the book was to consist of two thirds historical analyses of the development of the understanding of quality from reform pedagogy to the present day. The publisher didn't want that. So Horst Linder came to me and said: "Then you have to write the book!" - And that's how it turned out.
I wanted to call the book "Characteristics of Good Teaching". Horst Linder thought that was too defensive and said: "At your advanced age, you can be a bit more full-bodied. I suggest: What is good teaching?"
The precursor to the book was another seminar in which I formed ten teams. Each team had to work on one of the ten characteristics. In this book, I tried for the first time to get more involved in empirical teaching research. This was not yet the case with the guidelines and teaching methods, because at that time this empirical research was only rudimentary and because I had not received the few approaches.
This is the book that has been translated into the most foreign languages:

Denmark (2005) Croatia (2005) China (2011) Korea (2011) Egypt (2015)
I was and still am surprised by the response to this book. Obviously, many teachers are tired of always being told about PISA deficits. They want to be told in concrete terms which criteria are important to the author. And they gratefully note that the book is not a catalogue of recipes, but a catalogue of criteria that can and must be implemented in different ways. I want to start revising this book next year (2023).
(6) Two books related to vocational training: Together with my former doctoral student Catherine Walter-Laager, I published a guide
for the training of educators with Cornelsen-Verlag in 2012, in which the former educator and current elementary educator at the University of Graz (Austria) contributed her expertise in elementary education, while I contributed a compilation from my books Unterrichtsmethoden, Didaktische Modelle and Guter Unterricht . Incidentally, I find the photo on the cover of the book suboptimal: it shows five female educators,
gazing devotedly at the male lecturer - this reinforces, no doubt unintentionally, the role clichés.
The book Didaktik und Methodik in Pflege- und Gesundheitsberufen (Didactics and Methodology in Nursing and Healthcare Professions ), published in 2013 together with Hanover-based nursing didactics expert Uta Oelke (now in its fifth reprint), has a similar concept: Here, too, the nursing didactic parts are entirely from Uta's pen, while I have contributed my general didactic expertise.
8.3 By-catch
Not all publications were published by Cornelsen-Verlag. There were, as the fishermen on the North Sea coast say, occasional bycatch: books that I published with other publishers, but which had a much narrower target audience than the Cornelsen books.
(1) My first book was published by Kösel-Verlag Munich in 1971: Curriculumrevision: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen (together with Frank Achtenhagen, see section 4.1);
a year later, the same publisher published my dissertation (see section 4.4).
(2) Volume 3 of the Enzyklopädie Erziehungswissenschaft was published in 1983 by Klett-Cotta-Verlag with the volume title "Ziele und Inhalte von Erziehung und Unterricht" (co-edited with Hans-Dieter Haller). - This time-consuming work was published by Klett-Cotta-Verlag from 1983 to 1987 under the overall supervision of my then Münster co-assistant Dieter Lenzen.
(3) In 2007, the FRIEDRICH Annual XXV was published: Guter Unterricht, Maßstäbe und Merkmale - Wege und Werkzeuge. Edited by Andreas Feindt, Hilbert Meyer, Martin Rothland and others, the Friedrich-Jahreshefte are given as an annual gift to all subscribers to a journal published by Friedrich-Verlag. The annual issues therefore have a large circulation and presumably a corresponding response.
(4) In the same year, 2007, the book Wolfgang Klafki - Eine Didaktik für das 21. Jahrhundert? (Wolfgang Klafki - A Didactics for the 21st Century?) was published together with my
twin brother Meinert Meyer. This book was prompted by the fact that we were both asked to write one of the two expert opinions required for Wolfgang Klafki's honorary doctorate at the University of Kassel in 2004.
(5) The book Bildung gegen Spaltung was published in 2021. We wanted to send a signal,
that radical steps towards school reform must finally be taken. Unfortunately, the co-authors Annemarie von der Groeben and Susanne Thurn, both laboratory school teachers, passed away shortly after the publication. This pamphlet is now their legacy. In this volume, we argue for greater individualisation, call for the development of the didactics of diversity required to achieve this and adopt the idea of the educational toolbox from laboratory school didactics.
Conclusion: At first glance, it looks as if I have been writing books non-stop. But that impression is deceptive. I always worked on a new textbook for at least five years before it was finished.
8.4 Drawings
I don't want to adorn myself with other people's feathers. The vast majority of the many
drawings in my books are by Karsten Friedrichs, who helped me as a student assistant in 1982 to produce the first version of the lecture notes for my lecture on teaching methods (see above). Karsten then became a teacher for the subjects of Art and German at the Liebfrauenschule in Oldenburg. He lives "round the corner" from me. This was and still is an ideal situation for me: when a new book is being created, I always go to him with very rough sketches and say: "Can you draw this teaching situation?" "Can you draw a group of teachers in the general conference, a third of whom are about to fall asleep?" Or simply name a topic. And then, sooner or later, a drawing will be created that fulfils the assignment. For example, the cartoon for the assignment: "Why don't you draw something about the dialectic of teaching methodology?" - These became the two small drawings on the cover of the first edition of "Unterrichtsmethoden" (see above, p. 86)
Karsten's speciality was and is the production of head drawings (portraits). He also produced head drawings for the forewords of my books. The following four drawings show how I have changed visually over 40 years:

HM 1982 HM 1989 HM 1991 HM 2019
I can't draw heads like Karsten! My speciality is the much less sophisticated drawing of hedgehogs, suns, shells and similar creatures:

The many graphics in my books and the DIDACTIC LANDMAPS also come from me.
9 Sixtieth birthday (2001) and retirement (2009)
Detlef Spindler, then head of the Centre for Professional Practice, is a week younger than me. We therefore decided to celebrate our 120th birthday together on 19 October 2001. Karsten Friedrichs drew the appropriate cartoon for the invitation:

Alexandra Obolenski, Andreas Feindt, Ulrike Heinrichs, Ulf Gebken and Carola Junghans were responsible for the superb organisation of the event:

Retirement ceremony 2009: On 20 June 2009, my retirement ceremony took place in the old auditorium of the university, where I had heard lectures as a student in 1963/64, organised and designed by Sylvia Jahnke-Klein, Carola Junghans, Andreas Feindt, Volker Wendt, Ulrike Heinrichs and many other nice people.
The university's AStA had politely asked me beforehand if they could drop a banner denouncing the dean's faculty policy from the balcony of the auditorium during the celebration. I happily agreed and said: "Great! This will take me back to the turbulent beginnings of my doctoral studies at the FU Berlin on the day of my retirement!"

I still meet colleagues today who tell me how brilliantly these five organised the ceremony: They wanted to transfer my principle of action-orientation of teaching to a university celebration - and they really succeeded! As in every one of my lectures, there was a large FAHRPLAN, this time on the topic of "Teacher training in 6 acts":

The FAHRPLAN of the retirement ceremony set up on the stage of the auditorium
The individual stages:
- Astrid Kaiser, then the Institute Director, opened the event; and the Vice President, Mrs Ahrens, gave a welcoming address.
- The Dean of our School, sociologist Bernhard Kittel, gave a short speech in which he explained that I had had a good time between 1975 and 2009. Today the work has become much more demanding! Klaus-Jürgen Tillmann, who led a discussion about teaching quality on the podium after this opening, strongly disagreed with this - which made me happy!
- Assistants' choir: A production of the 35 student assistants and research assistants who currently work for me or have done so in the past, who commented lovingly and ironically on the conditions in my office (especially the midday nap on the rubber mat under the desk).
- Carola's husband Michael Greiner staged a stomp with all 300 guests, during which the following sounds were intoned by all guests in four-four time: tapping on the desk top at the seat - loudly folding up the claddings they had brought with them (as Hilbert always used them) - banging two stones together (as each examinee received as a gift) - hitting honey jars with spoons (they were under the seat; the reason: Hilbert kept giving away his brother-in-law Wolfgang's honey) - and an ostinato, struck by Luise with Hilbert's singing bowl.
- After the speeches and presentations, my wife Christa made the necessary comments on such a male academic career from a feminist point of view.

- At the end, the auxiliary choir sang a rewritten version of Peter Fox's "Haus am See", which all the guests were asked to sing along to. The chorus after each verse:
"And at the end of your labour in to the hedgehog house/
Chestnut avenue, Christa and pipe smoke/
You have shown us so much appreciation/
oh Hilbert, your trust has made us strong/
We have learnt from your person/
a biographical curriculum!"
Singing along was a success, as the photo from the university press office shows:

Front row from left: Andreas Feindt, Carola Junghans, Sylvia Jahnke Klein, Wolfgang Konukiewitz (my brother-in-law), Gisela Blankertz (my doctoral mother), Christa and Hilbert Meyer
I was particularly pleased with the choir of assistants because I have enjoyed working with them all my professional life:

Choir of assistants - in the front row: Rabia Schadel, Friederike Güffens, Reina Freese, Gesche Willerich and Ines Hartog
Conclusion:
I have been very lucky in my professional and academic career, despite the aforementioned Einstürzende Neubauten. I am wholeheartedly grateful to all those who have allowed me to do so and who have supported me in my professional and academic development. Some things did not work out. From today's perspective, I lack a stable empirical research practice of my own. On the other hand, I suspect that I would never have written my textbooks if I had first had to establish their empirical basis myself.
When writing this report for the first time in 2006 and even more so when revising it in 2022, I realised three points about my professional and academic career:
(1) I realised how strongly the esteem in which I was held by my doctoral supervisor Herwig shaped my university teaching behaviour. He demanded a lot, but gave me confidence and made it clear that I would succeed.
(2) I realised how much influence my twin status had on my personal development and later also on my academic work.
(3) I realised that German fascism and the misery of the Second World War had a greater influence on my academic career than I was aware of at the age of 20 or 30.
Carola Junghans, with whom I co-authored the new edition of the two volumes "Teaching Methods", writes in the theory volume (on p. 82) that challenging learning processes consist of the constructive processing of crises in the personal development process. I said to her: "I can't remember any such crises in my own career." Carola replied: "You just didn't notice them!"
Addendum:
On 20 May 2020, I was appointed Dr. honoris causa at Abo Academi University in Turku (Finland) for my contribution to the Scandinavian didactics discourse, triggered by many years of collaboration with Michael Uljens, Faculty of Education and Health Science at the external location in Vaasa.

From left to right: Dr h.c. HM, Dr h.c. Jan Masschelein from the University of Leuven (Belgium); Michael Uljens (host of Hilbert), Siv Björklund (host of Jim), the Rector of the Vaasa branch Lisbeth Fagerström, Ms Ann-Katrin Svensson and Dr h.c. Jim Cummins from the University of Toronto. Jim Cummins from the University of Toronto (Canada).
The ceremony was still conducted according to medieval rites: a good 90 doctoral candidates and 13 honorary doctorates
from five Schools were assembled, which were combined from two years ago due to the corona pandemic. We had to come forward one by one, receive our doctoral hat, sword and degree certificate from the dean and then make a deep bow to the rector - it took two and a half hours, during which only Latin was spoken. Afterwards, the newly graduated students processed together through the city to Turku Cathedral, the oldest church in Finland. An ecumenical service was held there in Swedish, in which the city's rabbi gave the sermon and the Protestant pastor as well as the Catholic and Russian Orthodox priests performed the liturgy. The university choir provided the music. Incidentally, the word "doctorate" comes from this rite: in the Middle Ages, all those who had passed the viva voce went from their School to the Rector once a year to receive their doctoral degree and hat. By the way: the School of Theology in Turku does not hand out swords! That's a good thing! I had to hand in my sword straight away: My nine-year-old grandson Theo Kasper begged me so hard that I couldn't resist giving him the sword.

Graduation of all doctoral candidates and doctores honoris causa at Turku Cathedral on 20 May 2022
[1] For those who are not familiar with the rock scene, this phrase is a reference to an experimental band that was popular in the 1980s.
[2] I have no fundamental objections to the switch to the BA/MA system. It strengthens university autonomy. What I do think is disastrous, however, is the hunt for points that begins in the first semester on the basis of the course certificates that conclude the exams. The 450 written exams that the three of us had to look through within a week were sheer nonsense from a didactic point of view! The current examination system hinders self-determined study and, as has long been empirically proven, leads to bulimic learning in many students.
[3] This is no. 97 from the list of publications "Essays" on my UNI homepage.
[4] Currently, for example, in the theory volume Unterrichtsmethoden (together with Carola Junghans, Berlin: Cornelsen 2022).
[5] The photo on the first page was taken by Michael Miethe (Berlin) for Cornelsen Verlag in 2009.
[6] He was murdered there by the Germans together with his orphanage children and his co-worker Stefania Wilcynska.
[7] Rolf Hornig (ed.) (1998). Three women in the 20th century. A biographical trilogy from Westerstede. Westerstede: Pleis Druckerei, pp. 108 to 156
[8] Through this great-grandfather I was very closely related to the brothers Gerhard and Ricklef Orth (later headmaster of my first practical school in Oldenburg). When I told them this, they were astonished.
[9] He never concealed this. He was therefore also tolerant when I had the report card remark "transfer jeopardised" or when one of my siblings was left behind. I found that very relieving.
[10] Friedrich Wissmann's habilitation thesis contains a chapter about this seminar and its pre-fascist director.
[11] In the work by Alexander Hesse ("Die Professoren und Dozenten der Preußischen Pädagogischen Akademien und Hochschulen für Lehrerbildung", Weinheim 1995, p. 309), a lot is said about the academic appointments of these lecturers and professors and also about my father based on the surviving personnel files (see the appendix in the script "Unsere Fluchtgeschichte" on this HOMEPAGE).
[12] His boss wrote in his statement on the proposal: "Meyer is suitable for the appointment because he has pedagogical talent."
[13] detailed in the text "Our escape story" on this HOMEPAGE.
[14] Only our grandmother enquired anxiously after our birth whether it was true that twins only get half of everything.
[15] When I went to my then Oldenburg university lecturer Werner Loch in 1964 and told him I would like to write a dissertation with him on the pedagogy of hitchhiking, he simply refused and suggested I write my dissertation on Schleiermacher's pedagogy - wise advice that I took to heart!
[16] I only had one teacher at grammar school, the biology and chemistry teacher Harder Stukenberg.
[17] The local Junge Union came to the PH and asked us to decline the invitation. Reason: "You must not stab Adenauer in the back!"
[18] On this occasion, he met the leading representative of polytechnic education in the GDR, Prof Hans Joachim Klein, and developed a long-standing friendship with him.
[19] The counter-invitation we extended to the FDJ members to Oldenburg was accepted, but never realised. In 1968, I met one of the former East Berlin students again at the Free University of West Berlin. She confessed that she - like several others - had only joined the FDJ's travelling cadre in the hope of escaping the republic. The Stasi obviously saw it the same way and did not approve of the trip.
[20] In July 1964, I summarised the notes in a small brochure.
[21] The first written grade at the PH at that time was the so-called "Vorexamensarbeit", which had to be written in the main subject. My lecturer, Professor Lüschen, didn't say a word about the grade during office hours, but remarked: "You're not crying. The female students always cry like that!"
[22] At that time, it was not yet possible to actively apply for a doctorate. You had to wait until you received an offer from a university lecturer.
[23] After a year, the teaching load was reduced to 25 hours. However, I had to attend a fortnightly seminar session organised by the school council and led by my Ocholt mentor Walter Spellig.
[24] All the pupils had to buy the German and maths exercise books twice so that I could check all the homework every day.
[25] Abridged version published in the journal "Bildung und Erziehung" (1968); reprinted in my volume "Türklinkendidaktik" (2001).
[26] I never learnt the history of this Free Conference. I suspect that it was founded at the end of the 19th century, when elementary school teachers were forming and saw themselves as a political movement.
[27] I started in 1964 with 28 pupils, but because very small schools in the neighbouring villages were closed, my class became fuller and fuller.
[28] I was made a civil servant three times and dismissed twice. Given the shortage of teachers at the time, there was no risk involved.
[29] At that time in Berlin, as in Münster in 1969, there was only the so-called undergraduate programme in the School of Philosophy and not a doctoral programme based on a first examination. Two minor subjects were required for the undergraduate programme, which were also examined in the viva voce.
[30] Alongside Herwig Blankertz, Werner Loch (then at the University of Erlangen) had also made me this offer. I wavered as to which would make more sense for me, but then clearly decided in favour of Herwig Blankertz because I had the - certainly correct - impression that I could learn more about the theory of science and criticism of scientific work from him.
[31] It was only 30 years later that Andreas Helmke and I discovered that we had both attended this congress.
[32] Traces of this work can be found in Blankertz's book "Bildung im Zeitalter der großen Industrie" (1969). At that time I did real archive work for the first and only time in my life and studied the documents available in the FU library on the National Convention during the Revolution (cf. J. Guillaume (Ed.) (1891-1907). Procès-verbaux du Comité d'Instruction publique de la Convention nationale. 6 volumes: Paris.
[33] I did not accept the formal reasons for this discrimination against the PH programme at the time, nor do I accept them today. The PH degree programme only lasted 6 semesters and was and still is not considered a scientific degree!
[34] A more detailed analysis of Blankertz's personnel, curricular and educational policy activities can be found in the Münster dissertation by Martin Rothland (first reviewer: Ewald Terhart).
[35] Wolfgang Klafki, Klaus Mollenhauer, Theodor Schulze, Ilse Dahmer and Hans-Dieterich Raapke from Oldenburg are also doctoral candidates of Weniger.
[36] Blankertz, Herwig (1978). The relevance of pedagogical theory for action. Self-criticism and perspective of educational science at the end of educational reform. In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 24th vol. p. 171-182.
[37] In a reply letter to van Dick dated 21 May 1981, Blankertz wrote: "At a young age, when I would not even have been of age according to today's law, I had to be a soldier in Hitler's Wehrmacht and had to make decisions that almost broke me. (...) Nevertheless, I do not see this as pacifism, but as a right and duty to fight against injustice and barbarism."
[38] Which I did not do.
[39] Cf. Hilbert Meyer (1993) In memoriam Herwig Blankertz. In: Herwig Blankertz Foundation of the City of Recklinghausen in cooperation with the Academy for Youth and Academic Appointments, Hattingen p. 13-28
[40] Herwig Blankertz had initially suggested that I clarify the deduction problem in a historical analysis of 18th century pedagogues. I found that boring. He immediately accepted my suggestion to relate this question to the US curriculum discussion, which had just become highly topical at the time, and supported it to the best of his ability.
[41] This generalisation of the title then brought me clear criticism from Hartmut von Hentig: on the occasion of the 500th anniversary of the University of Tübingen, he gave a lecture on the question of the practical relevance of educational research (published in HvH (1982). Recognising through action. Stuttgart: Klett), in which he criticised my dissertation as a prime example of practical irrelevance (op. cit., p. 35).
[42] Even today (2022), this is the number of students. In terms of enrolment figures, the University of Münster was and is primarily a teacher training institution
[43] In 1973, I was offered a well-paid salaried position (BAT I A) at the Düsseldorf Ministry because in November 1972 I had been asked by the Dean of the School of Education at the University of Trier-Kaiserslautern to apply for an H 4 position for which the application deadline had already expired. I didn't respond, but Herwig Blankertz pushed through the Ministry of Education and Cultural Affairs so that I was given a higher BAT classification.
[44] This was also due to the very favourable application situation for young academics (see below).
[45] I still haven't found out why these professorships are called "full". What is clear is that the H3 professorships and the associate professorships are not disorganised.
[46] They were the religious education teacher Lenchen Ramsauer, the maths didactician Heinrich Besuden, the political scientist Helmut Freiwald, who examined me in philosophy in 1964, and Ulrich Günther, who gave me the internship grade.
[47] Daughter of Lina Mayer-Kulenkampff, a leading social pedagogue in the Weimar Republic
[48] It is fitting that in Zurich, where he later moved, he got into trouble at the ETH for unauthorised secondary employment.
[49] A comprehensive overview of the concept is provided by the six-volume "Dokumentation zur Einphasigen Lehrerbildung" (Documentation on single-phase teacher training), edited by Wolfgang Fichten, Detlef Spindler and Ulrich Steinbrink and published by the Centre for Pedagogical Professional Practice Oldenburg (1981).
[50] I held the same view and until my retirement I introduced the "Werkstatt-Du" in the first lecture, but then immediately remarked: "The more socially powerful person determines the rules of the road. And at the moment, that's me. When you do your internships at schools, please stick to the rules that apply there!"
[51] That's why I still have an inner aversion to teaching concepts that want to completely abolish direct instruction.
[52] The seminar took place on Fridays from 6 to 8 pm. It was well and regularly attended.
[53] So there were two sessions each for supervising a practical training group - twice as much teaching load as today!
[54] Klaus Zierer, my successor in 2011, took this plaque with him when he left the University of Oldenburg. It now hangs in his office at the University of Augsburg.
[55] Taking so many holidays is a very recent invention and should not be taken for granted. My parents, my grandparents and their ancestors never went on holiday at all! And I always took work with me on holiday too.
[56] When I became dean of our department in 1989, I introduced a bill that showed that "actually" only 20 per cent of our teaching capacity should have been included in the degree programme in education, but that in fact it was 40 per cent. This meant that the many teacher training students were clearly at a disadvantage. The bill triggered heated discussions. Friedel Busch, who was in favour of the diploma course, said to me at the faculty council meeting: "You don't want the diploma course to be closed, do you?" - I didn't want that, but I wanted a fair and equal distribution of the shortage - and not the preference for students majoring in a subject, which is also common at many universities.
[57] From left to right: Wolfgang Fichten (the member elected by the doctoral candidate), Una Dirks (second assessor from Hildesheim), Hanna Kiper (Chair), Andreas Feindt (who has just been presented with a talking stone and a singing bowl by HM) and Matthias Schierz (sports didactics expert and examiner of the neighbouring subject).
[58] Barbara Moschner and I are competing a little to see which of us has or will have helped more people to gain a doctorate by the time we retire.
[59] One of my doctoral candidates, whom I had proposed for the Research Training Group "Didactic Reconstruction" (see point 7.5) and who was well on the way to writing an excellent dissertation on primary school didactics, had already teamed up with a partner who was initially very supportive, but then turned out to be a porn producer. He had a tendency towards violence. He owned a gun. He was banned from the university. He was constantly spending huge amounts of money that he didn't even have. The doctoral student stepped in, got more and more into debt and then, to everyone's horror, committed suicide. I keep thinking about this doctoral student and ask myself whether and how her death could have been prevented.
[60] Rainer should actually have done his doctorate at the Institute of Mathematics Education at Bielefeld University - but the doctoral degree regulations there did not allow it. He "only" had a Diplom in psychology.
[61] Volker had already been discharged as a Bundeswehr pilot at the age of 42, but didn't want to retire and asked if he could do his doctorate with me on the subject of "Personal initiative in further academic education". Which he did.
[62] Hans Krull actually wanted to write a dissertation with me after his retirement on the subject of examination didactics and had already diligently collected empirical material (tape recordings of examinations), but then had to abandon the project for health reasons.
[63] In a maths exam for a grammar school teaching degree, the professor suddenly said: "Oh no, I withdraw this question. That's only for Diplom exams!" He was signalling his teacher training prejudice with this question and did not know that this student already had a maths diploma.
[64] Nothing came of the university school. I asked the Minister of Education, Rolf Wernstedt, about it. He said: "Yes, do that!" To the follow-up question: "What funding will we get for this?" he had to answer: "None!" So the idea was buried for the time being. But perhaps it will succeed in the new century.
[65] Hilbert Meyer & Wolfgang Fichten (2009). Introduction to action research in schools. Aims, procedures and results of a BLK pilot project. Oldenburger VORDRUCKE No. 581. Oldenburg: Didactic Centre of the University. (93 pages).
[66] Renate Klingberg once told me what experiences were involved. And Lothar confirmed the statement by nodding his head: Lothar had been drafted as a 17-year-old into a pioneer unit that had been captured by a partisan group in the Czech Republic in the final months of the war. The 18 or 19 soldiers had to line up according to age. Then they were shot one by one. Lothar, the youngest, was told to run away. He was sure that he would be shot as he ran away. But they let him be the only one to run - perhaps because they wanted word of the fate of the others to spread around the war zone. Since this event, Lothar has had a massive heart condition.
[67] New teachers were deployed in the Soviet occupation zone, sometimes without any training, to replace active Nazi party members. Lothar had close contact with his first class throughout his life. A third of this first school class from Otterwisch attended Lothar's funeral 45 years later (which I was also able to attend and gave a short speech at).
[68] It was only after reunification that Lothar was able to inspect the files of his habilitation procedure at the University of Leipzig and then saw that a colleague had objected to his procedure because, in his opinion, he had received the bourgeois pedagogue Johann Friedrich Herbart too uncritically.
[69] Klingberg's biographical data can be found on the homepage of the University of Leipzig. It outlines his first studies at teacher training colleges in Silesia, which he cancelled due to the war, his deployment in a battalion of the Waffen SS in the last months of the war in 1945, his time as a new teacher, his studies at the University of Leipzig and his positions as a professor in Leipzig and Potsdam.
[70] Because of this contact, I was also present as a reviewer at the last extended doctoral examination (habilitation) of the APW; the successful candidate: Petra Stephan.
[71] After reunification, Elisabeth sent me copies of the various file notes and instructions.
[72] Only the West German Rainer Winkel attracted unpleasant attention because he asked the pupils in the primary school class he was observing to sing an FDJ song. The class teacher came crying to Elisabeth afterwards. She felt that her serious desire for reform had been duplicated.
[73] When we first made contact in Oldenburg, the Chair's advisor said that they wanted to "de-Stalinise" IG Metall's educational work - a pithy formulation that challenged me.
[74] I am still friends with Lothar Wentzel, who is responsible for educational work on the IG Metall executive board in Frankfurt/M. and comes from Oldenburg.
[75] From time to time I am asked whether I have become a millionaire thanks to the book royalties. I then reply: "Not at all! I have a very nice extra income, but it's still significantly less than what a married couple of teachers or university lecturers earning twice as much have at their disposal every year!" I have used the extra income to send four children to university and to pay off the house in Kastanienallee in Oldenburg step by step. However, the sales success does not apply to all books: the two volumes on "Schulpädagogik" (1997) and the book "Unterrichtsentwicklung" (2015) had or have very modest sales figures.
[76] A Greek-Latin teacher once came to me in a curriculum committee of the Kollegschulversuch and asked: "Does the word operationalisation come from opus and ratio?" (A classical philologist could have worked out for himself that this is not the case!)
[77] That sounds very selfless, but it wasn't at all. I had already calculated that an inexpensive book would sell better and for longer.
[78] The first edition cost DM 12.80, a price that was only possible because the publisher was prepared to take the risk of printing 20,000 copies in the first edition. Urban & Schwarzenberg wanted to offer the book for 18 or 19 DM; Klett for double the Scriptor offer.
[79] There had been a pirate printing of parts of my "Leitfaden" at the Centre for Teacher Training at the University of Osnabrück, which the Osnabrück department heads had read. Among other things, they criticised the statement that only alienated learning was possible at school. They rightly surmised that such a term had a meaning derived from Karl Marx.