Equivalence check(source)
Equivalence check(source)
Start text
Check here whether there is an equivalence between competences acquired outside the university and the learning outcomes of a study module and whether recognition is recommended.
- []:Using the authentic evidence provided (A1, A2, etc.) and the relevant references and certificates (Z1, Z2, etc.), check whether it is plausible that the student actually possesses the skills and abilities stated.
- Based on the supporting documents, it is plausible that the student possesses the specified skills and abilities.
- Based on the supporting documents, it is largely unclear whether the student possesses the stated skills and abilities.
- Based on the evidence, it is largely not plausible to determine that the student possesses the stated abilities and skills.
- [1.1]:Check that the skills and abilities (left column of the crediting synopsis) match the learning outcomes of the module (top field of the crediting synopsis).
- The learning outcomes are fully covered by the skills and abilities described.
- In your opinion, the learning outcomes are sufficiently covered by the skills and abilities described.
- In your opinion, the learning outcomes are sufficiently covered by the skills and abilities described. However, the module has learning outcomes that are essential for the success of the degree programme or for professional practice, which the student does not have or which have not been sufficiently demonstrated.
- In your opinion, the coverage of the learning outcomes by the skills described is not sufficient for credit transfer.
- [2.2]:Classify the study module and the competences and skills of the student on a qualifications framework (EQF, HQF or DQR).
- The level of the student's competences and skills is at the same level as the study module or even exceeds the level of the study module.
- The level of the student's competences and skills is at a lower level than the study module.
End texts
- [1.2]:Result of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to propose a technical discussion to validate the portfolio and to reject or approve the crediting on this basis.
- [1.3]:Result of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to request supporting documents or to reject the crediting.
- [2.1]:Result of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to approve the credit transfer. As the learner already has all the learning outcomes aimed for within the module, no separate level check is necessary.
- [2.3]:Outcome of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to reject the credit transfer or to propose a specialised interview for validation.
- [2.4]:Result of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to reject the recognition.
- [3.1]:Result of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to approve the crediting.
- [3.2]:Result of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to reject the crediting or to propose an expert discussion for validation.
Start text
Check here whether there is an equivalence between competences acquired outside the university and the learning outcomes of a study module and whether recognition is recommended.
- []:Using the authentic evidence provided (A1, A2, etc.) and the relevant references and certificates (Z1, Z2, etc.), check whether it is plausible that the student actually possesses the skills and abilities stated.
- Based on the supporting documents, it is plausible that the student possesses the specified skills and abilities.
- Based on the supporting documents, it is largely unclear whether the student possesses the stated skills and abilities.
- Based on the evidence, it is largely not plausible to determine that the student possesses the stated abilities and skills.
- [1.1]:Check that the skills and abilities (left column of the crediting synopsis) match the learning outcomes of the module (top field of the crediting synopsis).
- The learning outcomes are fully covered by the skills and abilities described.
- In your opinion, the learning outcomes are sufficiently covered by the skills and abilities described.
- In your opinion, the learning outcomes are sufficiently covered by the skills and abilities described. However, the module has learning outcomes that are essential for the success of the degree programme or for professional practice, which the student does not have or which have not been sufficiently demonstrated.
- In your opinion, the coverage of the learning outcomes by the skills described is not sufficient for credit transfer.
- [2.2]:Classify the study module and the competences and skills of the student on a qualifications framework (EQF, HQF or DQR).
- The level of the student's competences and skills is at the same level as the study module or even exceeds the level of the study module.
- The level of the student's competences and skills is at a lower level than the study module.
End texts
- [1.2]:Result of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to propose a technical discussion to validate the portfolio and to reject or approve the crediting on this basis.
- [1.3]:Result of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to request supporting documents or to reject the crediting.
- [2.1]:Result of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to approve the credit transfer. As the learner already has all the learning outcomes aimed for within the module, no separate level check is necessary.
- [2.3]:Outcome of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to reject the credit transfer or to propose a specialised interview for validation.
- [2.4]:Result of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to reject the recognition.
- [3.1]:Result of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to approve the crediting.
- [3.2]:Result of the review: According to your information, it is recommended to reject the crediting or to propose an expert discussion for validation.