Current legitimisations of art education/pedagogy WS 16/17
Programme
t h e n s t a g e s , 1 8 - 2 0 h o u r
18 Oct. 2016 | RAHEL PUFFERT: An introduction
25 Oct. 2016 | ALEXANDER HENSCHEL (Oldenburg): Staged complexity. On the coexistence of art education and art teaching
01.11.2016 | PIERANGELO MASET (Lüneburg): Legitimisation in times of Black Pedagogy 4.0
08.11.2016 | WIEBKE TRUNK (Oldenburg): If not now, then when? - The (new) responsibility of art educators
15 Nov 2016 | RAHEL PUFFERT (Oldenburg): Creating spaces (!). Art education in the here and now
22.11.2016 | MANUEL ZAHN (Braunschweig): Aesthetic education in digital media culture
29.11.2016 | ADAM PAGE (Berlin): Democratisation through art? Practical examples from the outskirts
06.12.2016 | Interim reflection
13.12.016 | KEA WIENAND and ANJA HERRMANN (Oldenburg): Art education from an art-scientific, feminist and postcolonial perspective
20 Dec 2016 | CARL-PETER BUSCHKÜHLE (Gießen): Art education and authorship - art education and the art of living
10 Jan 2017 | CARMEN MÖRSCH (Zurich): The education of A_N_D_E_R_E_N with art: art education, coloniality and white femininity
17.01.2017 | N.N.
24.01.2017 | PAUL MECHERIL (Oldenburg): Contextualising, alienating, encouraging. Art education in the migration society
31.01.2017 | Merge<link typo3/sysext/cms/layout/db_layout.php?id=38971# - - Edit>
</link>
Current legitimisations of art education/pedagogy WS 16/17
In view of a changing educational landscape and new socio-political and technological challenges, the question arises as to whether the existing concepts of aesthetic education are still relevant.
Whether taught at school or outside of school - how is the relevance of art and its teaching justified today? How does the subject respond to social developments indicated by keywords such as 'inclusion' or 'migration'? How is aesthetic practice and theory changing in digitalised everyday life? Does art education in the museum and exhibition sector still need to fight for acceptance or has it long been accepted? And what significance does it have in relation to the expanding field of cultural education? To what extent is aesthetic education affected by a state-funded creative industry and the concepts of art and creativity that it disseminates? And last but not least: How can working contexts and discursive exchange be strengthened in this situation?
Contact:
Dr Rahel Puffert
Administrative Professorship
Art - Mediation - Education